Making the news today....

[trigger_andy]

1 hour ago, Rich Rule said:

I think the estate comment was in relation to the upper class being the only people who hunt.  Ie upper class toffs.

 

Matts comment was to illustrate that it is only upper class who hunt.

Well thats cleared that up then.  

[Khriss]

19 hours ago, Big J said:

 

By paying working class lackeys £40 a day. By trampling across land that they don't own or have a right to access. By endangering the public by chasing (for instance) deer across public roads. 

 

Last year I almost hit a stag on the A396 that was being pursued by some twat in fancy dress on a horse.

It would read better on the statement " whilst avoiding a stag galloping across the A396 , I hit the twat in fancy dress on a horse with my Vimek, which sustained no injury - my thoughts are with the stag's family , yr 'onour "  K

[eggsarascal]

It's got a bit waspy, is it because it's snowing?

[Rich Rule]

1 hour ago, trigger_andy said:

Well thats cleared that up then.  

Auto correct.  
 

Original post has been edited.  

[trigger_andy]

1 minute ago, Rich Rule said:

Auto correct.  
 

Original post has been edited.  

You cant pass up a golden opportunity like that.  

[doobin]

Well I don’t know about anyone else, but seeing men who are ready to tear each other’s throats out over the honour of a woman squaring up to each other and calling each other ‘babe’ is exactly what I was hoping for when the new swear filter was introduced!

[Stubby]

10 minutes ago, doobin said:

Well I don’t know about anyone else, but seeing men who are ready to tear each other’s throats out over the honour of a woman squaring up to each other and calling each other ‘babe’ is exactly what I was hoping for when the new swear filter was introduced!

I could not punch my way out of a soggy paper bag nowadays so I kept out of it . I respect anyone's views on this emotive subject and like ( albeit from a keyboard  ) both the combatants for their knowledge and content . It is a bit uncomfortable listening to the grrrr . I hope they can bury the hatchet ( not in each other ) and move on . 

[gary112]

13 minutes ago, Stubby said:

I could not punch my way out of a soggy paper bag nowadays so I kept out of it . I respect anyone's views on this emotive subject and like ( albeit from a keyboard  ) both the combatants for their knowledge and content . It is a bit uncomfortable listening to the grrrr . I hope they can bury the hatchet ( not in each other ) and move on . 

So now your suggesting they take an axe each other to sort out then🤣

[Stubby]

1 minute ago, gary112 said:

So now your suggesting they take an axe each other to sort out then🤣

I did say " not in each other " you blood thirsty gladiatorial hound you ! 😁

[coppice cutter]

9 hours ago, Rich Rule said:

Yet my father always said the hounds on the fox was one of the most efficient ways to despatch the fox.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'd have thought that a head shot right between the eyes would be considerably more humane, should the dastardly deed need done, than being ripped apart by dogs.

 

That having been said, I've been asked both for permission for a hunt to go through and permission to go after foxes with rifles and refused them both.

 

We don't let lambs out at night in the spring until they're able enough to fend for themselves, and the chickens are closed in every night anyway so we do our best to co-exist with them rather than kill them.

Edited November 28, 2021 by coppice cutter