OK, to try & put web development into perspective in brief, is difficult - so how long is a piece of string?
When I used to do this sort of stuff I'd speak to the client to obtain their requirements, usually the brief was fairly vague but Id get them to show me a site they liked & make it like that or similar.
Id write the code ground up using text editor or my ancient version of DreamWeaver 4.1 well before Adobe got hold of it & ruined it. So that would produce fairly sleek efficient code that search engines like. This would maybe take me about an hour or two maximum for which Id charge £25 an hour so your six page site would cost £300 max, more like about £250 TBH.
Then Web2 came along with moving banners, flashing stuff & all sorts of fancy graphics along with every kind of plugin security vulnerability (ie flash etc) you could think of which screwed things up, I know it looks so pretty but you can produce an entire website in about an hour or so but its full of junk that you dont see or need, dont get me wrong some of the sites look great & really deliver, but theres a lot of superflous stuff. Sites that are clean means even 5, 6, 7 or more years after development they still get P1 results in Google search. That brings the subject of SEO, all my pages would be optimised but some companies expect you to pay extra but why should you not have anything but search engine optimised code?
So you have to strike a balance between what you want & what will get you business, people dont read acres of text, so just say what you need to, stick to relevent facts & keep your images the right size & meaningful & make sure your phone number is on the banner for every page as at some point, the client may make a 'buy decision' & wants to talk about it.
On a more important point, did you get any flicks of madame très chère?
Good luck
N