treequip
-
Posts
10,076 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Freelancers directory
Everything posted by treequip
-
Not inexperienced just bad experience(es) Cone splitters generally don't have an emergency stop and the nature of the design requires you to have your hands in the mix. When they bight, they really do bight. I saw an old boy try to kick a stubborn log onto the cone, he missed and the cone screwed itself between the sole of his boot and his foot. He couldn't stop the machine and just had to wait (and scream) until it bust his boot off his foot breaking many of those little bones in his foot as it went. When there have been enough accidents (reported) the HSE will inevitably turn their gaze to these machines as they did with the chipper in feed situation. On the up side a cone mounted on a crane or 360 is a magnificent tool.
-
What do you think of this bad boy???
treequip replied to A Pettersen-Firewood&Chip's topic in Arb-Trucks
They are a bit numb for UK roads, the obvious solution is to build one on a UK chassis. -
Mr Blair is spot on. Anything on the 3pl tends to be a bit "loose" if you ask it to reach sideways. Side arm flails need side reach, they are demountable but most are mounted to the axle which gives them a lot more stability.
-
What's to interpret? "for use in the course of his work" Its pretty simple, what it doesn't say is cart timber back to the yard to be split nest time its raining. What it doesn't say is cart chip and dump it at the allotments.
-
They tend to run on 3/8 or bigger, they run slower than a petrol powered saw but they have bucket loads of torque.
-
Wot they said plus your mini digger wont have nearly enough flow on the hammer circuit
-
Why it's best to leave cutting down trees to the professionals!
treequip replied to AA Teccie (Paul)'s topic in AA
I think he meant how did it get on the wall -
Why it's best to leave cutting down trees to the professionals!
treequip replied to AA Teccie (Paul)'s topic in AA
Slow news day at the Metro?? That clip has been in circulation for well over a year [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNrb0rZYzbg]Awesome Tree Felling Fail - YouTube[/ame] -
I disagree The exemption is "for the driver's use in the course of his work" and removing waste is not "for use in the course of his work" its waste removed from site, back to a depot for further processing. Your bowser is the perfect example of the exemption, clearly you don't need to empty the bowser for the journey back, the contents of the bowser are unused materials and not waste you are removing from site.
-
But that exemption wont cover you if you move anything off site. No logs or chip away.
-
That's the way to go particularly if you have a tracked chipper, hitch it on and shove it around with the chipper:thumbup1:
-
What do you think of this bad boy???
treequip replied to A Pettersen-Firewood&Chip's topic in Arb-Trucks
Yup Many years ago when I was young and impressionable I saw one of their depots on a week end. At the time I was amazed that there were that many chippers in the world, and that was just one depot:laugh1: Bucket trucks, "chuck and duck" and Mexicans, its what Asplundh are made of -
What do you think of this bad boy???
treequip replied to A Pettersen-Firewood&Chip's topic in Arb-Trucks
And in the states, outfits like Asplundh have them by the dozen -
What was it doing?
-
They aren't saying you cant earn a crust, they are saying you are going to have to do that somewhere else, my yard is on commercial land, they don't bother me.
-
When this conversation took place were either of you under the influence of drink or drugs? 4 is a doozy, I will get myself a muck licence instead of an "O" licence, much cheaper and a lot less work
-
On a roadside job a member of public stopped on a slip road over the crest of a hill to scrounge some logs, while he was asking an artic gathered his polo and moved it a ways down the road. He couldn't see further than a boot full of free logs.
-
That set up seems to be successful. I know a guy that did the same thing in a disused quarry When planning enforcement visited and he just shoved the building a couple of feet with a huge 360 and they went away satisfied.
-
Vehicles OVER 3500kg are subject to "O" licence
-
Yes but its a PITA, better to look out for a second pair of spikes
-
The spikes are the same, its the gaff that differs, pole gafs are a lot shorter and best for poles and thin barked trees. Long gaffs are great for spongy barked trees and those ivy clad horrors but take a lot of getting used to on anything else.
-
Calibration takes half an hour every 2 years, you will spend more time drinking coffee than dealing with tacho issues, if "tacho time" impacts your margin that badly you need a new business model.
-
Hi Steve Unless its a planning application the LA cant condition anything, its a "211" and the ONLY option is a TPO If it is a SSSI that's natural England's remit, the LA has no interest and couldn't bring a prosecution it they tried
-
You need to stop ranting and start thinking I don't get why you are so hung up on the tacho issue, its just a card to fill in (Or a digital one is less again) As a tree surgeon there wont be many days where you get out of your first driving period so its not like you are going to run out of hours. You cite a trailer of 2700kg but you can go to 3500kg with the land rover, and (insert fanfare) the land rover is 4x4 and as such qualifies as a dual purpose vehicle and is tacho exempt (insert large cheer)
-
The issue is indeed the prevention of disturbance but that has NOTHING to do with the "211" nor does the authority have any power to require any sort of paperwork other than the "211" They can ask but you don't have to comply, they can require and you don't have to comply. If the contractor is concerned about the presence of a protected species they can by all means get a report but that's between the contractor and the ecologist he is paying. The report is nothing to do with the LA, even if they did have sight of a report how would they do anything about it? They have no powers to insist any recommendations were met. This is just some LA dude justifying their own existence
