Making the news today....

[pleasant]

Braverman is a breath of fresh air...a politician telling us how it is. Politicians rarely do this now for fear of losing votes, so issues that the government and MSM consider 'controversial' are avoided, covered up or shouted down using excuses it may be racist, inflammatory or inciteful. Just another example of the cover up and the never ending campaign to stifle the truth by the minority who shout the loudest.

 

'British Home Secretary Suella Braverman warned this week that the migrant crisis in the United Kingdom has reached the level of an "invasion," which drew both criticism and support from local politicians, with some calling for her resignation.

"The British people deserve to know which party is serious about stopping the invasion on our southern coast and which party is not," Braverman, a conservative, said this week. "Let’s stop pretending they are all refugees in distress, the whole country knows that is not true."

Braverman added that her country’s "hopelessly lax asylum system" is "broken."

Braverman’s comments drew harsh criticism from liberal politicians, including Kim Johnson, a lawmaker for the main opposition Labour Party, who said Braverman's language would inflame tensions amid the growing immigration crisis along the English Channel'

Edited November 2, 2022 by pleasant

[Stere]

Think the term invasion usually denotes an army conqueoring the country?

 

 

 

 

 

[pleasant]

6 minutes ago, Stere said:

Think the term invasion usually denotes an army conqueoring the country?

 

 

 

 

 

There are several definitions, and yours is a very selective one of them.

 

Every had you home 'invaded' by a load of ants in the Summer?

 

Or your privacy invaded by a nosey neighbour?

 

See.....it can be used in many ways. The MSM and others used a particular definition this week to suit their agenda

Edited November 2, 2022 by pleasant

[Steve Bullman]

6 minutes ago, Stere said:

Think the term invasion usually denotes an army conqueoring the country?

 

 

 

 

 

[Stubby]

10 minutes ago, Stere said:

Think the term invasion usually denotes an army conqueoring the country?

 

 

 

 

 

Remember the ivy thread , the invasive species ?

[Doug Tait]

3 minutes ago, Stubby said:

Remember the ivy thread , the invasive species ?

There was an invasion of threads about Ivy

[Vedhoggar]

It is plain to see that the asylum system is not fit for purpose and our taxes are being squandered on dealing with illegal immigration. Labour will want to see the back of Suella Braverman no doubt because she will win back the support of many Red Wall voters which has been lost. 

[pleasant]

3 minutes ago, Vedhoggar said:

It is plain to see that the asylum system is not fit for purpose and our taxes are being squandered on dealing with illegal immigration. Labour will want to see the back of Suella Braverman no doubt because she will win back the support of many Red Wall voters which has been lost. 

The Labour 'open doors' policy has a lot to answer for.

 

Firmly beleive the Blair/Brown ideal, was to allow the population to be swelled by immigrants who would go on and become nationals, and would become natural Labour voters.

[Mark Bolam]

35 minutes ago, Stere said:

Think the term invasion usually denotes an army conqueoring the country?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Even if you want to use that definition she’s still spot on.

[Stere]

Ok but like  hordes swarming an army etc invasion is  imo abit of an "emotive" phrases if its used for humans .

 

 

Im not sure how&if this new  idea banning all channel crossing asylum status will work?

 

Is the plan they all be sent to Rwanda or is the idea that alot less will arrive after?

 

Most just end up working illegally & staying atm even after they failed to get asylum?