Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's kind of the whole point. They can be made from anything. So any old bit of material could be used with very open pores that lets just about anything in or out.

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
1 hour ago, woodwizzard said:

That's kind of the whole point. They can be made from anything. So any old bit of material could be used with very open pores that lets just about anything in or out.

The official guidance I read was to use 3-ply material or 2-ply if need be but some will be using ‘any old bit of material’ as you say. Those blue disposable ones that are a bit open at the sides you see many using are 3-ply. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Big J said:

I don't especially like wearing masks, principally because it obscures the view of my most excellent beard. I feel that others are missing out....

 

But

 

It is easy for us lot (who are generally not in high risk categories) to dismiss the value of them. For us they are an inconvenience, an infringement on our personal liberties even. For a previously very active and sociable octogenarian, they are the reassurance that allow them to start to interact with society again. 

 

Masks do have a tangible effect on transmission rates, and they have a pyschological benefit for those who are genuinely terribly afraid to go out in their communities. We may disparage or dismiss those with such fears, but even if the fear is misplaced, it's still a fear. 

 

So the very minor ballache of having to shroud my world class viking beard is a price worth paying if it helps older people with comorbidities get out and about and avoid the associated health issues of enforced lockdown. It's only a bit of cloth with a couple of bits of elastic, it's not a conspiracy theory.

Sorry mate but you got no Viking left in you. Would Eric the Red have worn a face mask? Would he ****************. 

  • Like 4
Posted

It's crackers, I went to Tesco yesterday there were signs all over saying you must have a face covering from 24th. I spoke to an old lass I know who works there, I asked her if she's got to wear a face covering all day... her reply... no, it's up to us if we want to wear one.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 19/07/2020 at 09:42, doobin said:

Sorry mate but you got no Viking left in you. Would Eric the Red have worn a face mask? Would he ****************. 

Might just point out Eric the Red be dead  ? K

Edited by Khriss
'Broad Jon Broad axe ' be very much alive n posting thee ether letters of awe....
Posted
On 17/07/2020 at 20:03, trigger_andy said:

Gonna have to get one! :D

You don’t need ‘a card’ (that you presumably have to pay for from some scrounging band-wagon organisation) It’s a self declaration. 
 

Simple. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Accepting all of the previous points relating to the value of a face covering being for the benefit of others rather than oneself, and noting the supposedly ‘vulnerable’ groups that are ‘supposed’ to benefit from others wearing masks....

 

Rather than inflicting a broad ranging (but clearly not all encompassing) requirement upon the majority (for the benefit of the minority) why not have Mon-Thu shopping for the majority and Fri shopping for those that might draw some intangible comfort from imposing restrictions on the many. 
 

OK, at a stretch Mon-Weds for the majority, Thu-Fri for the inherently afraid. 
 

It is utter, inconsistent, unjustifiable bullocks. 
 

PS - bouncing on 1 leg with thumb up ass is standard procedure down St Breward way every ½ moon. 

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Accepting all of the previous points relating to the value of a face covering being for the benefit of others rather than oneself, and noting the supposedly ‘vulnerable’ groups that are ‘supposed’ to benefit from others wearing masks....

 

Rather than inflicting a broad ranging (but clearly not all encompassing) requirement upon the majority (for the benefit of the minority) why not have Mon-Thu shopping for the majority and Fri shopping for those that might draw some intangible comfort from imposing restrictions on the many. 
 

OK, at a stretch Mon-Weds for the majority, Thu-Fri for the inherently afraid. 
 

It is utter, inconsistent, unjustifiable bullocks. 
 

PS - bouncing on 1 leg with thumb up ass is standard procedure down St Breward way every ½ moon. 

How much time do you spend shopping?  I can't see you browsing the aisles of supermarkets on the regular.
There's mass uncertainty at the moment. For the sake of donning a mask while grabbing some supplies, it's not a major inconvenience.

PS - If you stick your thumb up your ass and press your belly button for five seconds, you reset.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Mark J said:

How much time do you spend shopping?  I can't see you browsing the aisles of supermarkets on the regular.
There's mass uncertainty at the moment. For the sake of donning a mask while grabbing some supplies, it's not a major inconvenience.

PS - If you stick your thumb up your ass and press your belly button for five seconds, you reset.

You’re ABSOLUTELY right Mark. I spend very little, I mean VERY little time in confined spaces with the great unwashed. 
 

You’re also absolutely right in that (in theory) it ought to be a really minor inconvenience’ to don a covering when in a shop. 
 

But, and here it comes, the but....

 

I have a deeply ingrained aversion to illogical, unreasonable and autocratic imposition of ‘rules’ by ‘the man.’

 

In this case, the wearing of Face covering to shop - but not play sport, drink beer, eat food, go to school (for the we’en), work in a shop - which is about as retarded a government directive as I can think of and it just about typifies the race to the bottom mentality of complying to the lowest common denominator that seems so prevalent in modern society. 
 

There are 2 options really, everyone wears a futile face covering to make some people feel better, or some people where a decent mask to keep themselves safer. 
 

No prizes for guessing my preferred option..... 

 

As an aside, I have read the dotgov GUIDANCE (not law) and will (until the end of grass & nettle pollen season) be self declaring an exemption.  I don’t need a card, a lanyard or a lengthy explanation as to why I’m not wearing a face covering nor should any self appointed Facebook moral police (nor D&C constabulary) expect any other explanation than - “I know what the guidance states, I know what the exemptions are and since I’m NOT wearing a face covering you should assume I am exempt.  Now ? off”

 

If they don’t let me in the shop so be it, I’ll suck it up. 
 

 

 

  • Like 7

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.