Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

treequip

Veteran Member
  • Posts

    10,076
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by treequip

  1. This depends on establishing the position of the boundary to a degree of accuracy, which is not always that simple You can also look at the tree from a trespass point of view, the tree belongs to the majority owner and is trespassing on the neighbour.
  2. You don't get it do you, the Hobbs is a proprietary device that's been through all the hoops and tests. It is a certified device, this thread is about home made non certified kit. Naysayer?................... like I said, I write this as a man who has made many lowering devices, including the one I use daily.
  3. What again? every time I opt out of one spam they start another. I shouldn't have to opt out, none of the other dealers spam me, it just smacks of desperation.
  4. Except that if it does go wrong they will take your money, your kit, your house and your happy retirement. And I say that as a man who has made several lowering devices.
  5. And yet again I find myself on the end of orange plant junk mail, this time its text messages I have no PPI claim I don't want laser eye surgery and I don't need a chipper STOP SPAMMING ME
  6. I can do that for you
  7. What do you need doing mate?
  8. Back in the day it was a front line saw. My ruined fingers speak to many years on the 38 It's 2 generations out of date so today it's a firewood pile saw, it's rugged and dependable but the power to weight ratio isn't there. Modern saws will leave it for dead Value????? Is it a going concern? I will give you 50quid for the nostalgia value:laugh1:
  9. I mark biners and the like (when needed) for LOLER inspections and i do to with a dremmel It just depends on how and where you mark it
  10. Antal Low Friction Rings - From £8.25 - Force 4 Chandlery
  11. I am an inspector and the job is an hourly rate. The only way it could be abused is if the inspector supplied kit, but even in that case there is no obligation to buy replacement kit from the inspector. If a client did suspect the assessor was taking the pee, they can always find another.
  12. Not quite that simple If it's like for like manufacturer then the chassis rails will probably be the same distance apart. If it's another make they probably won't be
  13. Drew LOLER is what you already do, if you had to comply to UK LOLER you might have to record a bit more of what you check but that would be all. LOLER is the UK part of pan European legislation and it only exists because some people can't be trusted not to allow the use of shabby kit. We are an unfortunate casualty of that situation.
  14. Any kit with a "life" without an audit trail fails. The ones that are going to moan are going to moan, the criteria for an inspection is fit for use, pass or fail. The feelings of a client are irrelevant to the inspection.
  15. Not "from now on" but if the owner of the kit can prove its date into service, there is no reason you cant make it a new ID or a new tag with the original number. Any changes should be recorded in the inspection.
  16. You can use your professional judgement to determine the "fit for use" but replacement cost should not be a factor in that decision making process.
  17. The rope is bad but I will give him a pass on the rest. The bare chest isn't every ones taste but it is filmed in the USA and jeans are allowed
  18. What he said....twice over:thumbup1:
  19. In the interests of a fair comparison, the 201 is pants out of the box and you are comparing a modified one with a stock saw, why not compare it to a modified 540?
  20. Its true that polly is bad on heat but if you think that's bad spend a lot more an dyneema and you will have the same problem. Heat only builds up when the knot isn't dressed properly or it slips on a turn. Like any tool, treat it within its limits and it will serve you well.
  21. Well if using LOLER expired kit is OK to pull stuff over for Bob, I am willing to continue with my tried and tested.
  22. And since we are dealing with a vehicle with a MAM of 3500kg I said We have large ally bodies in the UK but they only work well on large capacity vehicles that don't carry aggressive loads (or they need a sacrificial liner) But I appreciate that this is a different country with different ways of doing things. You just have to know what you are talking about.
  23. It works for me and has done for a couple of decades. I have used it to pull with tirfor, vehicle winch and vehicles up to tracked diggers. If 4 ton wont pull it over its time for another plan.
  24. A heavier flywheel is better at smoothing out peak loads which makes it kinder on the drive line.
  25. An unloader valve kicks in when the set pressure is reached, while the air supply is in use the PTO is grafting. I have seen one running a 6 inch chipper, have you seen one that broke while running a chipper?

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.