Nimby

Ok, I have now read the thread and as ever with these issues, it doesn't make sense. With respect to Bullish, have you (if possible) spoken to the Tree Officer for the Council. I wouldn't post this sort of issue on here as it's just guess work?

With respect Edward, you are a person involved in trees but most people are not. If there are any discrepancies with trees on a site, a TPO and a potential new owner, the solicitor deals with it. Well, they do when they contact me for a copy of an Order. I should probably read the whole thread

Sorry, not really read all the thread. If you are purchasing a property are the solicitors not dealing with the issue? You shouldn't need to get involved?

It's social media, ignore it and move on. If you respond, you will fan the flames of trolls. If there are no birds nesting in the hedge, the works are not illegal. Flail cutting a hedge, certainly if it's Hawthorn, will benefit the hedge.

Have you tested them for decay? Use a nylon hammer. Submit an application for removal and take it to appeal if you have it refused.

The Ivy is the best thing about the hedge. Leave it and just prune the hedge as normal.

Yes, the tree was TPO'd, not long after the land was purchased, due to a in coming Planning App.

Thanks Gary, Just to confirm, the garage was dealt with as PD (permitted development) and was built on the original raft. Canal Navvy, that's is my concern. However, I have found this in the Governments guidance: Tree Preservation Orders and trees in conservation areas What limits the local authority’s liability to pay compensation? Legislation limits the authority’s liability by setting out circumstances in which a claim cannot be made and circumstances in which compensation is not payable. Subject to specific provisions relating to forestry operations in protected woodland, any claimant who can establish that they have suffered loss or damage as a result of an authority either refusing consent or imposing conditions in respect of protected trees is entitled to claim compensation. However the authority’s liability is limited. In such cases, compensation is not payable for any: loss or damage which was: reasonably foreseeable by that person; and attributable to that person’s failure to take reasonable steps to avert the loss or damage or mitigate its extent; loss or damage which, having regard to the application and the documents and particulars accompanying it, was not reasonably foreseeable when consent was refused or was granted subject to conditions; Interesting stuff!!

Scenario: Nice tree, recently re-built garage. Garage owner submits TPO app for removal based on foreseeable damage (it is very close and tree now rubbing on soffits) and states that compensation will be sought from the LA if application is refused. Is there any existing case law of a similar situation or has anyone any experience of said events? Tree is TPO'd and has a reasonable level of amenity. Also, at least one neighbour has said they would not like to see it removed. Any thoughts appreciated.

This looks like Cupressus nootkatensis which is a parent of the Leylandii.

Appreciate the response Jamie, many thanks.

Thanks Mark, appreciated.

The main question I would like to ask is: Bills of Quantities, Does it work? if not, what is the alternative? Just looking at the break down of a tree contract whereby outside contractors have to give a price for Crown Raising, Thinning and Reducing of small medium and large trees. The price they are looking for is based on the pruning of upto X amount of trees. I find it so vague, how much to raise thin and reduce etc is not even mentioned. I also think it's risky for contractors to enter into such a process when there are surely more questions than answers. Bearing in mind Council's will probably be looking at the best price as a higher percentage than quality, how is it possible to even come up with a figure. How do you as a contractor come up with a price? As asked above, are there any alternatives? Do you know of Council's that operate their tree works in a different way?

TPO trees on LA managed land is a bit odd, not unusual, just a bit odd. Can you not talk to the TO? Does the application not have to go to be discussed at a Council Members meeting? if so, you should get the chance to speak at this.

Not sure I agree with that. Do you really think it's an "immediate risk"? I at least try and make contact with a TO first.

It's not an application, it's a notification. *coat......

If I were you, I would check with your LA to see if there's a TPO or if you are in a Conservation Area.

You will need to discuss the change of species with the TO as this will affect the TPO. Also, plant during the 'planting season' November onwards.

Fear not as it's a natural process. These trees, London Plane (Platanus), are drought tolerant and can handle extreme heat.

That may well be a Portugese Laurel. Although they do tend to have reddish stems?

I'm also a TO that finds these threads really frustrating. We deal with applications and notifications as quickly as possible, sometimes the same day! Google street view helps to speed things up at times but for us it's about having confidence in our local contractors. A lot of tree work is subjective, give and take is the key. Work with us and we work with you, which makes all our jobs easier and frees time to deal with other matters. A lot of our local contractors take pride in their work regardless of TPO's or CA's. Sadly, the TO is close to extinction and problems will only get worse as public services are diminishing. For the record, we charge £10+VAT for a copy of the order which is set by the Planning Support team. I do, however, send out maps and/or schedules to contractors free of charge that don't need a full copy of the order.

Is the first tree an Acer negundo?

Crab Apple? Malus spp.

I was walking around the hills Settle, North Yorkshire, earlier this spring and all (and I mean all) the areas of Ash regen were affected.