I bottled a tree once, It was a big old lime and the spec was for a 25% reduction. There was a cavity at the base which could take the entire length of a broom handle. I refused to climb it ( I had only been climbing for 6 months). My friend and rival Robbie climbed it no problem a few weeks later and did a lovely job.
The tree is still there 8 years later.
The more I have learned about trees both in the class room (Tech Cert and PTI) and in practice climbing and cutting the more I trust them. I would like to think that I don't take stupid risks, but since that day I have always found a way to get the job done.
I posted this earlier on the cut and hold thread, I think its partly relevant here too, in the sense that the broader your climbing horisons are the more chance that you will be able to get the job done.
"Once you have developed a good repetoire of skills, you can treat each tree, and each cut, as you see fit, you make these decisions according to personal safety, likelyhood of breaking something and speed and efficiency. If I think that cutting and holding is the safest and quickest method for a particular branch then I'll do it. Thet does'nt mean I'll do it on every branch.
Only using one method for all your work is stupid, in some cases it will be slower, in others less safe. spending ages trying to get into an awkward position for one cut with 2 hands on the saw when you could have cut and held it is pointless.
I would encourage every climber to add new skills to his repetoire at every opportunity, once aquired they are seldom lost, and may well get you out of a tight spot that would have otherwise stopped you.
I'm sure we have all watched other climbers working and thought "I wouldn't have done it that way" I have. Either rigging a limb you would have cut and chucked or visa versa. I have often seen people climb things I would have felled. Too many climbers have only one or two methods at their disposal and it shows".