Making the news today....

[BillQ]

7 hours ago, Mark J said:

"never met"?

Not sure if he said that, he did say that he has no recollection of going to some nightclub and then on to a knightsbridge or somewhere house for sex. The photo with what's her face in the background shows he clearly has met her.

7 hours ago, Mark J said:

I think they should make him answer questions in the states if he's implicated in the Epstein Files

Possibly part of the reason he is now a Mr.

[Stubby]

23 minutes ago, BillQ said:

Not sure if he said that, he did say that he has no recollection of going to some nightclub and then on to a knightsbridge or somewhere house for sex. The photo with what's her face in the background shows he clearly has met her.

Possibly part of the reason he is now a Mr.

Is he now the artist formally known as Prince ? 

[Mark J]

51 minutes ago, Stubby said:

Is he now the artist formally known as Prince ? 

The Andrew formally known as Prince. 

[Mark J]

1 hour ago, BillQ said:

Not sure if he said that, he did say that he has no recollection of going to some nightclub and then on to a knightsbridge or somewhere house for sex. The photo with what's her face in the background shows he clearly has met her.

Possibly part of the reason he is now a Mr.

What are the accusations against Prince Andrew?

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

---

Here's what you need to know about the sex abuse claims being pursued by Virginia Giuffre in the US.

 

 

[Steven P]

For legality, she was 17 and in the UK so it was all 'legal', however he was mid thirties so definitely not something that you can defend. As to what Roberts was told to do, not sure Andrew was the instigator in those demands or whether Maxwell and Epstein were the only ones demanding she slept with him as a 'gift'. So legal in the UK... but nothing you can defend I reckon.

 

Like Trump I reckon he knew exactly what Epstein was up to, and is complicit in those crimes also by his silence.

[Mark J]

2 hours ago, Steven P said:

For legality, she was 17 and in the UK so it was all 'legal', however he was mid thirties so definitely not something that you can defend. As to what Roberts was told to do, not sure Andrew was the instigator in those demands or whether Maxwell and Epstein were the only ones demanding she slept with him as a 'gift'. So legal in the UK... but nothing you can defend I reckon.

 

Like Trump I reckon he knew exactly what Epstein was up to, and is complicit in those crimes also by his silence.

I think it's unlikely that the poor lass who topped herself was the only victim in the ex-Duke of York's association with Epstein. 

I also struggle to believe that other members of the royal family were unaware of what was going on. 

[BillQ]

1 hour ago, Mark J said:

only victim in the ex-Duke of York's association with Epstein

Yet nothing as yet...strange considering the wedge she got for silence?

[Mark J]

35 minutes ago, BillQ said:

Yet nothing as yet...strange considering the wedge she got for silence?

If/when they restart America, and swear in the last person needed to sway the votes on Epstein files being released I suspect there will be further revelations. I can't believe that  the royal family with their own police, were unaware of Andrew's deviance. Likewise, I struggle to believe that nobody had flagged up Saville to Charles. 

Anyhoo, I am but a serf. 

Edited October 31 by Mark J

[Stubby]

I see Andrew Windsor - Mountain goat is going to relieve a 6 figure sum together with a big dollop of pocket money each month from the King , and they crime doesn't pay . Bloody disgusting .   

[Mike Hill]

On 28/10/2025 at 21:08, Steven P said:

 

I guess there is a different category for bombardment in a ceasefire?

Yes

 

They use mostly peaceful artillery shells.