Interesting article in one of the motoring supplements at the weekend about the real cost of running a car, calculated as the pence per mile (ppm). Figures looked at the typical motorist buying a brand new vehicle, driving 12,000 miles per year and retaining the car for three years.
The calculation took in to consideration three years servicing, depreciation, all taxes and duties, fuel cost and initial purchase price but not insurance (this is dictated more by other factors such as the drivers age) and was based on the average purchase of a small/medium four/five door family car.
The most expensive car to run based on the above is the...............Nissan Leaf at 52ppm.Apparantly the purchase price is non negotiable and the predicted resale value represents a £20,000 decrease, partially due to the fact the very expensive batteries will be nearly due for replacement. It doesn't stop there however, the second most expensive is the Toyota Prius hybrid at 46ppm, followed by the Lexus hybrid at 45ppm.
I also remember reading an article a few years back which claimed the environmental cost of making such hybrids was three times that for a standard petrol or diesel car. Apparantley the very precious minerals required for the manufacture of the batteries are flown backwards and forwards across the globe before the manufacturers end up with a finished battery! Do the people who buy such cars realise the damage created in their manufacture?
I'm going to show my age here, I recall watching a programme, possibly Panarama, in the early seventies about the fuel for the future - hydrogen. I distinctly remember watching a car being driven, parked up with the engine running and the presenter collecting water coming out of the exhaust and putting it back in the tank before driving off again. If we could do that in the seventies why has it not been developed and put in to manufacture in the following 40 years? One can only guess the oil companies have had something to do with it.
Thank you and goodnight.