Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, stihlmadasever said:

How does this affect a rescue scenario?

Would a rescue climber have to instill 2 ropes to perform a rescue?

Also how will this affect a spiking up a stem in a rescue situation?

 

I think a qualification in needle point is now required to perform such tasks..

  • Haha 2

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
11 hours ago, stihlmadasever said:

How does this affect a rescue scenario?

Would a rescue climber have to instill 2 ropes to perform a rescue?

Also how will this affect a spiking up a stem in a rescue situation?

 

That depends whether the tree was being pruned or removed :D

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Gary Prentice said:

That depends whether the tree was being pruned or removed :D

Wot...... just spike up the back of the trunk , then the Network Rail inspector can't see yr gaff-outs. K

Posted
16 hours ago, Gary Prentice said:

I'm f**k*** glad I've more or less retired from climbing. 

more or less?? Anyway me too but then I never had any climbing training though manage to collect a set of NPTC certs for it.

 

Last commercial climbing was when I was 60

  • Like 3
Posted

i ve been thinking that in order to appease the hse , then  one easy enough step to take that probably wouldnt effect ones climbing too much would be,

a second back up anchor point, in the form of a split tail and ring or somthing similar tied off to a different stem or lower down.

not sure how this could be retrivable but iam sure someone would figure it out.

if this became best practice then it could help their concerns over anchor point failure.

carl

Posted

It had crossed my mind that a line attached to a cambium saver / rope guide running through a crotch and down the back of the tree to a basal tie off as in an SRT setup would effectively back up that anchor point. But then I'm not sure how big an issue anchor failure really is? Ironically the one time I have snapped one was when I was tied in on two lines which allowed me to 'push the envelope' in a pollard full of weak attachments, as was mentioned in a post earlier. 

Posted

the 2nd line used in the irata world is not a working line. It is a backup attached usually dorsally or sternally with a device that follows the climber and only comes into play when needed. This does not transfer well to treework where task, equipment & method  are different & where the Issues arise 

  • Like 1
Posted

Can someone enlighten me,if the industry refuses to follow the approved code of practice and AA say it’s wrong how can it be enforced surely it’s no longer approved?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.