Guys this isn’t
Just about checking up on companies or individuals or about trying to catch anyone out, or just about promoting a select group, its also about speaking on behalf of you, representing you, promoting quality work so that the dodge & scarper brigade get a reduced foot hold Because the Awareness of the public & procurement departments & colleges & & & will have a focus.
You are correct that many have gone before, & still remain some look solely at an individuals academic Quals, some look at the academic & practical application of skill some look just at the company,
But who has looked at the industry from the boot laces on up???
, from training - equipment supply, insurance issues, education, awareness, promotion of the industry, recommendations for practical best practice. assist with training packages not just the hands on Stuff but How to write an Ms & Ra Whats the law on bird nesting.
advice as apoint of reference, Not as a bunch of know it alls but as a means of assistance.
We all know that some La stipulate various criteria in their pqqs
Why is there such a wide range of requests, - because they simply don’t have a working knowledge of such a niche industry. There are just so many Hoops to jump through & not all of those hoops are needed.
So we feel that a clearly difind benchmark that is practical, as a point of reference would help.
Some pqqs stipulate Mewp operation tickets as mandatory but if you don’t use a mewp then why request it. Also if you have a mewp operator & the guy in the bucket holds climbing certs Should he/she have to have cs47 ?
The main issue is that, As we see it Common sense has largely disappeared from what is in the main a practical skills based industry, we can all pontificate & theorise ,but without practical skill nothing we get done as chainsaws don’t do the work independently.. it will remain a set of well intended ideas.........
Okay So one example & I choose this for no reason other than it popped into mind
the recent Nos & nptc Coc CS 31 , assisted felling of a tree utilizing a rope
Application & need.
Yes in Arbor trees are pulled over, to reduce the need to totally sectionally dismantle it, once sufficient canopy has been removed by either a climber of pole operations from the ground. employing a rope & either a winch Or groundies to assist the stem down safely.
however in the context of tree Felling
this would only be required when the felling direction is opposite the weighted portion of the tree !
However we already have split level cuts for that! don’t we.. ?
& if we explore it further , what size rope will be required SWL wind loading etc ?
What attachment method will be employed ? How many groundies ? Or are we utilizing a winch ? How close can we get to the felling ?
as Afag state no persons within Two tree lengths. when felling.
& if we do adopt this method do we stop teaching split level , Do we get rid of cs44 felling a standing stem using a tug line ?
Our should it be seen as reasonable for those who hold Cs31 then automatically gain cs44?
I can see the nee for cs 44 in some application.
However the confusion comes yet again , when a site specification criteria states must have all nptcs this can include cs44 , yet many Arbs wont have it as it is in my opinion supper ceded in gaining Cs31,
I know of instances where those who held cs 31 32 couldn’t go onto a site because they didnt have Cs 44
I also know of companies who have staff trained to cs 30 31 32 38 39 40 41 stump grinder, chipper, first aid trained but were stopped work because they didn’t have any one qualified in cs 45 ground worker
When I came to this industry I knew very little & it was very difficult to get a direction,
So many voices saying so many things & yet the industry is still fragmented !!!
Should this continue ? I don’t think so
Will the Treeguild help I hope so as it draws on the experience of real practioneers, who have started this project from the stand point of complete frustration.
Kind regards Iain