Making the news today....

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

On 27/05/2018 at 10:46, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

This one slipped by relatively quietly:

 

https://metro.co.uk/2018/05/25/tommy-robinson-arrested-outside-child-grooming-trial-breaching-peace-7579280/

 

Over 200k people signed petition for release though and it’s gone up by 5k in about the last hour:

 

https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-free-tommy-robinson?recruiter=877816824&utm_campaign=signature_receipt&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=share_petition

 

 

Passed ½ a million signatures on the petition now....  strangely quiet on the news and a demo planned for 9 Jun.

 

 

[difflock]

Perhaps a touch of Sharia Law should be applied to the no-doubt devout Muslim men,

who were involved in these awful grooming cases,

and, of course applied with the reasonably sketchy burden of proof that seems to be required in Middle Eastern/Arab trials.

Like the old Wild West approach to their known wrongdoers, "he will be hung after a fair trial"

cheers

marcus

[Mark J]

2 hours ago, difflock said:

Perhaps a touch of Sharia Law should be applied to the no-doubt devout Muslim men,

who were involved in these awful grooming cases,

and, of course applied with the reasonably sketchy burden of proof that seems to be required in Middle Eastern/Arab trials.

Like the old Wild West approach to their known wrongdoers, "he will be hung after a fair trial"

cheers

marcus

If you applied the same logic to the nonces in the church, they'd be absolved within ten hail Mary's. 

 

 

[scotspine1]

23,000 Islamic extremists living in Britain, but it's ok, because the guy who talks about them is in jail.

 

 

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/huge-scale-of-terror-threat-revealed-uk-home-to-23-000-jihadists-3zvn58mhq

 

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/pjmedia.com/trending/anti-islamist-activist-tommy-robinson-jailed-in-england-for-reporting-on-muslim-rape-gang-trial/amp/

 

. 

[eggsarascal]

I've no problem with what Tommy Robinson was doing in Leeds, the law on the other hand.........

 

He could have recorded all that footage and held on to it until the trial was over, then broadcast it.

 

The problem, as I see it, is if he broadcasts something that causes a retrial those witness will after go through the whole procedure again, or worse still, the trial collapses and they all walk.

[Mark J]

6 hours ago, difflock said:

Perhaps a touch of Sharia Law should be applied to the no-doubt devout Muslim men,

who were involved in these awful grooming cases,

and, of course applied with the reasonably sketchy burden of proof that seems to be required in Middle Eastern/Arab trials.

Like the old Wild West approach to their known wrongdoers, "he will be hung after a fair trial"

cheers

marcus

Shakira Shakira:

 

 

[TIMON]

I've no problem with what Tommy Robinson was doing in Leeds, the law on the other hand.........
 
He could have recorded all that footage and held on to it until the trial was over, then broadcast it.
 
The problem, as I see it, is if he broadcasts something that causes a retrial those witness will after go through the whole procedure again, or worse still, the trial collapses and they all walk.

I understand what you are saying and I agree, but I struggle to believe that was the motivation behind his incarceration.
I would love to be proven wrong on this mind.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12415/british-media-lies

[Vespasian]

2 hours ago, eggsarascal said:

I've no problem with what Tommy Robinson was doing in Leeds, the law on the other hand.........

 

He could have recorded all that footage and held on to it until the trial was over, then broadcast it.

 

The problem, as I see it, is if he broadcasts something that causes a retrial those witness will after go through the whole procedure again, or worse still, the trial collapses and they all walk.

You might have a point only the jury already know their names and what they were accused of...  plus plenty more sordid details.

 

The reason Tommy was jailed was because the judge wanted to believe Tommy might prejudice the trial, not that Tommy had..

 

So a judge can arbitrarily jail someone now cause he can imagine an offence and not an actual offence taking place..

 

I don't know but isn't that the opposite of justice?... 

 

The judge eyed the accused, he imagined this man might be a rapist for a moment and that was good enough to send the accused to the gallows..   

 

Not to mention would any appeal judge throw a case out on such flimsy flannel as a utuber filming the accused entering the court bandying insults about?.. I think not.. 

 

 

[Vespasian]

3 minutes ago, TIMON said:

 

I understand what you are saying and I agree, but I struggle to believe that was the motivation behind his incarceration.
I would love to be proven wrong on this mind.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12415/british-media-lies

 

 

Tommy was arrested for a breach of the peace, and that is what he was going to be charged with..  only I don't imagine the judge could prove a charge of conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace so he cobbled a new charge together, one he could use to jail Tommy with..

 

just to stick the knife in he added an anti terrorist D,notice law as a cherry on top..   

 

The only reason Tommy is in jail is he had the audacity to piss of some judge, and the judge found a legal means to punish Tommy for being in his face at his trail... so to speak.

 

This is a clear miscarriage of justice in my opinion, more's the pity I wasn't in that courtroom defending Tommy at the time.. I'd of made a monkey out of that moron..

[eggsarascal]

4 minutes ago, Vespasian said:

Tommy was arrested for a breach of the peace, and that is what he was going to be charged with..  only I don't imagine the judge could prove a charge of conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace so he cobbled a new charge together, one he could use to jail Tommy with..

 

just to stick the knife in he added an anti terrorist D,notice law as a cherry on top..   

 

The only reason Tommy is in jail is he had the audacity to piss of some judge, and the judge found a legal means to punish Tommy for being in his face at his trail... so to speak.

 

This is a clear miscarriage of justice in my opinion, more's the pity I wasn't in that courtroom defending Tommy at the time.. I'd of made a monkey out of that moron..

What was the Judges legal means to punish him?