Making the news today....

[Mark J]

8 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Hate to break it to you, they already do.

All security services check for keywords, phrases and have done for decades, CIA since the 60s.

 

WhatsApp is encrypted for whatever that's worth, but I won't put any confidence in that as anything that moves digitally is hackable, crackable and read in real time before it even arrives in your inbox.

 

The real nub of the argument is, making political figures records public or atleast recorded and not ammended.

 

Parliamentary records is one such recording.

They keyword thing was more prevalent in days prior to digital communications and it still goes on. Encrypted messages on all platforms are likely to be stored, when they encryption key is revealed so are the messages. 

I agree that political figures' communications should be made public, I also think that their financial affairs should be in the public domain.

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Mark J said:

Dave, how many more times do you want to ignore the fact that the opposition are just that, opposition, they had no real say in what went on. 

Of course they did Mark they could as the title suggests oppose or at least ask the right questions. How many times will you refrain from acknowledging that the opposition wanted more stringent and longer lasting restrictions 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️Ffs mark it’s on record they fought every attempt to ease them. The whole lot of them in Westminster and the Welsh/Scottish equivalents are at fault with a few notable exceptions. 

[Mark J]

6 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Of course they did Mark they could as the title suggests oppose or at least ask the right questions. How many times will you refrain from acknowledging that the opposition wanted more stringent and longer lasting restrictions 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️Ffs mark it’s on record they fought every attempt to ease them. The whole lot of them in Westminster and the Welsh/Scottish equivalents are at fault with a few notable exceptions. 

Perhaps they'd have asked better questions if they were privy to the communications of the Cabinet Office at the time. What do you think they should do better when the next pandemic comes along?

[GarethM]

If, and that's a very big if.

 

We should do what Sweden did, protect the vulnerable and carry on. Maybe a little extra support if you are ill but I am a small c conservative at heart.

 

How many tree guys did you see cowering behind the sofa ?.

[Macpherson]

Surely all these links to a new rash of MSM's ' latest ' take on their OWN bullshit story can be really nothing but intentional and depends fully on the short memory of the masses...

 

Is Hancock's prominent reappearance at this time a random occurence, most likely not.. after all it's the same MSM controlled by the same bought and paid for scum that's putting out the stories to suit whatever the agenda is.

 

Just like some nasty person getting written in and out of a soap script, ad nauseam.

 

To me newspapers have loads of great uses though.. cleaning windows, starting fires, soaking up oil, paper mache, masking off things, wrapping up broken glass and wiping yer arse when caught without bog roll....  I'm sure I've missed a lot of others😁

 

There's never really been any point in reading them if you want truthful genuine information👎

 

 

[Johnsond]

52 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Perhaps they'd have asked better questions if they were privy to the communications of the Cabinet Office at the time. What do you think they should do better when the next pandemic comes along?

You ****************ing  kidding Mark that grounds been gone  over so much. The next pandemic 🤷‍♂️You really buy that shite ?? 

[Mark J]

2 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

You ****************ing  kidding Mark that grounds been gone  over so much. The next pandemic 🤷‍♂️You really buy that shite ?? 

I see loads of dead sea birds when out fishing, I reckon avian flu has the capacity to turn a bit naughty. 

[Johnsond]

5 minutes ago, Mark J said:

I see loads of dead sea birds when out fishing, I reckon avian flu has the capacity to turn a bit naughty. 

Well let’s not let Ferguson do the modelling whatever happens, his track record is abysmal. Mark the country was conned/coerced  massively with huge long lasting detrimental consequences. People responsible for this should be held accountable. Regards the “next”Pandemic 😞 Mark it’s looking more and more like it was not a natural cross over etc. 
Basically the vast majority of western governments went absolutely nuts or did they 🤷‍♂️

[sime42]

I don't think there's much danger of HanCock staging a come back. He only goes on TV these days if he's paid too much money to eat insects, in a jungle.

 

As for the motivations behind this whole thing; surely it's just driven by the personal agenda of a certain Isabel Oakeshott, and that's hardly a secret, she's very forthright about it. Occam's razor.

 

Don't think its a question of if, more just when - We'll see another pandemic. We're f*cking with nature in so many ways, and there's plenty of hostile regimes around the world for those preferring a man made cause. Then add into the mix things like increasing antibiotic resistance, rising obesity and other health issues, and mass pan global travel. You'd have to be a bit naive to believe that the human race is by any means in control of that lot. We're the author's of our own demise. 

 

 

 

 

 

[Johnsond]

19 minutes ago, sime42 said:

I don't think there's much danger of HanCock staging a come back. He only goes on TV these days if he's paid too much money to eat insects, in a jungle.

 

As for the motivations behind this whole thing; surely it's just driven by the personal agenda of a certain Isabel Oakeshott, and that's hardly a secret, she's very forthright about it. Occam's razor.

 

Don't think its a question of if, more just when - We'll see another pandemic. We're f*cking with nature in so many ways, and there's plenty of hostile regimes around the world for those preferring a man made cause. Then add into the mix things like increasing antibiotic resistance, rising obesity and other health issues, and mass pan global travel. You'd have to be a bit naive to believe that the human race is by any means in control of that lot. We're the author's of our own demise. 

 

 

 

 

 

I’ll happily take my chances without a mask, lockdowns, social distancing,, essential items only or any of the other utter bollocks they imposed. I’m ok to live in naivety to an extent if that’s what it takes rather than fear about what’s coming next. Life’s a bit short for that  and the crap we had to deal with from those lying scum politicians and celebrity hungry scientists.