Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Making the news today....


Mick Dempsey

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

22 hours ago, trigger_andy said:

How did you come to that conclusion based on what was written in the tweet? 

WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM

The London Economic | Caroline Lucas put forward the amendment, calling for "red lines in the negotiations" rather...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9c62fc34-parliament.jpg WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM
The London Economic | Caroline Lucas put forward the amendment, calling for "red lines in the negotiations" rather...  



Had a read. Am I right in thinking it’s an amendment from the Green Party and Starmer that was put to a vote and not passed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Not looking for a fight on this one Mark, but the reason they weren’t included this time is because they are still in the timeframe from their last negotiated pay deal. 
 

Aren’t we meant to stand by deals?

 

Maybe so, but the dynamics are somewhat different now.
I think it's reasonable to renegotiate things when unforeseen events occur.

image.thumb.png.093a302d7bc74b45f24de1374eb5dd57.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mark J said:

 

Maybe so, but the dynamics are somewhat different now.
I think it's reasonable to renegotiate things when unforeseen events occur.

image.thumb.png.093a302d7bc74b45f24de1374eb5dd57.png

Ah yes, “bands”

 

If not absolutely all, the vast majority of public sector pays scales are subject to bands which increase annually in recognition of an additional years experience and seniority gained in post. 
 

This was the “hidden” pay rise that (I’m going to say all - pending someone coming up with a random exception) public sector workers received OVER AND ABOVE the very well reported minimal rises during the period of austerity. 
 

Whilst the headlines reported zero or minimal % public sector pay rises during austerity, they spectacularly and simultaneously excluded annual incremental band progression from the headlines. 
 

The notion that public sector pay has stagnated for a decade is simply inaccurate. Annual (automatic) incremental band progression paints a very different picture to that which is broadly painted. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Ah yes, “bands”

 

If not absolutely all, the vast majority of public sector pays scales are subject to bands which increase annually in recognition of an additional years experience and seniority gained in post. 
 

This was the “hidden” pay rise that (I’m going to say all - pending someone coming up with a random exception) public sector workers received OVER AND ABOVE the very well reported minimal rises during the period of austerity. 
 

Whilst the headlines reported zero or minimal % public sector pay rises during austerity, they spectacularly and simultaneously excluded annual incremental band progression from the headlines. 
 

The notion that public sector pay has stagnated for a decade is simply inaccurate. Annual (automatic) incremental band progression paints a very different picture to that which is broadly painted. 

From what I understand, there is usually a top band which is reached after a certain number of years, for example teachers can reach the top of their pay scales in about 12 years. So a more experienced staff member who chose to stay in the classroom rather than chasing promotion would have had their pay stagnated for a decade. I'd imagine it's a similar scenario across other industries where pay increases with experience, that only goes so far. So in terms of majority of people in those industries their pay did increase but only as they gained experience, those who were already experienced and chose to stay in more hands on roles rather than going for more desk based jobs had pay stagnation or cuts when annual rises were below inflation. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not looking for a fight on this one... increments have always been there, in the private sector too.  But they're not automatic (though usually implemented) and not annual.  They vary but automatic increment every year is not the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.