Making the news today....

[skc101fc]

14 minutes ago, manco said:

why did you stop? its too much fun to give up.

nothing as fun as baiting a racist troll online

The other children gave up talking to me

[sime42]

On 05/11/2025 at 14:00, Johnsond said:

No irony 42 Sam as he’s called seems a top bloke, did his job and when the shit hit the fan he stepped up to the mark. 
Regards the other bit has the motive for the attack been released yet ??. You are barking at an empty space 42. Bit like your Southport comments. 

 

No mention of terrorist motives in the Southport enquiry either yet. Are you hoping that'll come out in due course? Until then, there's some concerning figures just come out from the Prevent programme. #Readthenumbers

 

Of the 8,769 referrals where the type of concern is specified, 21%, or 1,798 cases, were due to “extreme rightwing concerns”; 10%, or 870, were referrals connected to Islamist ideology; and 56%, or 4,917, were for individuals judged to have no identified ideology.

Five per cent (469) of referrals were due to concerns regarding “fascination with extreme violence or mass casualty attacks (where no other ideology)”. This category recorded a large increase in referrals in the latest quarter, January to March 2025, rising by 240% compared with the previous quarter.

 

The latest data showed that children aged 11-15 represented the largest proportion of referrals where the individual's age was known, at 36%.
This was followed by children aged 16-17, at 13%.
There were also 345 referrals for children younger than 10, representing 4% of the total cases.

 

It seems to me that we're raising a generation of very ****************ed up children at the moment. Why is that, what do you think is going wrong in our society Davey? Where has this sick fascination with violence come from?

 

Major issues like this are what the public discourse should be centred on. Not all the other guff. 

 

 

 

 

[Mike Hill]

1 hour ago, sime42 said:

 

No mention of terrorist motives in the Southport enquiry either yet. Are you hoping that'll come out in due course? Until then, there's some concerning figures just come out from the Prevent programme. #Readthenumbers

 

Of the 8,769 referrals where the type of concern is specified, 21%, or 1,798 cases, were due to “extreme rightwing concerns”; 10%, or 870, were referrals connected to Islamist ideology; and 56%, or 4,917, were for individuals judged to have no identified ideology.

Five per cent (469) of referrals were due to concerns regarding “fascination with extreme violence or mass casualty attacks (where no other ideology)”. This category recorded a large increase in referrals in the latest quarter, January to March 2025, rising by 240% compared with the previous quarter.

 

The latest data showed that children aged 11-15 represented the largest proportion of referrals where the individual's age was known, at 36%.
This was followed by children aged 16-17, at 13%.
There were also 345 referrals for children younger than 10, representing 4% of the total cases.

 

It seems to me that we're raising a generation of very ****************ed up children at the moment. Why is that, what do you think is going wrong in our society Davey? Where has this sick fascination with violence come from?

 

Major issues like this are what the public discourse should be centred on. Not all the other guff. 

 

 

 

 

Violent Video games is my guess,also the lack of discipline at home.

[Rich Rule]

7 hours ago, Mark J said:

Ha ha, really? You rate Liz Truss's financial acumen?

Ha ha ha. Give me stength...
 

Liz Truss: A quick guide to the UK's shortest-serving PM

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

---

Here's what you need to know about Liz Truss and why she resigned as prime minister.

 

And you believe anything that comes from the BBC News?

 

Anti semetic bunch of knobs who will peddle anything if it fits their agenda.

 

Did you not see the latest one about their manipulation of the timeline from Donald Trumps Speech before the riots and marching on congress.

 

Splicing together two clips that were 54 minutes apart to make it look like POTUS called in people to march and kill.

 

It almost caused a civil war in the US and many people fell for it.

 

 

 

 

[Mark J]

56 minutes ago, Rich Rule said:

And you believe anything that comes from the BBC News?

 

Anti semetic bunch of knobs who will peddle anything if it fits their agenda.

 

Did you not see the latest one about their manipulation of the timeline from Donald Trumps Speech before the riots and marching on congress.

 

Splicing together two clips that were 54 minutes apart to make it look like POTUS called in people to march and kill.

 

It almost caused a civil war in the US and many people fell for it.

 

 

 

 

Democrats in US Congress ask Andrew to appear for questioning over Epstein links

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

---

The panel, which does not have the power to subpoena Andrew, made the request as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.

 

[Mark J]

1 hour ago, Rich Rule said:

And you believe anything that comes from the BBC News?

 

Anti semetic bunch of knobs who will peddle anything if it fits their agenda.

 

Did you not see the latest one about their manipulation of the timeline from Donald Trumps Speech before the riots and marching on congress.

 

Splicing together two clips that were 54 minutes apart to make it look like POTUS called in people to march and kill.

 

It almost caused a civil war in the US and many people fell for it.

 

 

 

 

Rich, with respect, Trump did actually call on his "Proud Boys" to assemble. 

Trump nearly caused a civil war. And he's having a go at starting another one. 

He doesn't give a toss about the little people.
 

Edited 1 hour ago by Mark J

[sime42]

1 hour ago, Mike Hill said:

Violent Video games is my guess,also the lack of discipline at home.

 

Yes, that's a couple of big reasons I'd guess. Though I reckon sick, violent social media content is more influential than video games these days. 

 

Parental failure, lack of discipline and loss of control, at home seems to be a big factor so far in the Rudakubana case. 

 

 

[Rich Rule]

32 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Rich, with respect, Trump did actually call on his "Proud Boys" to assemble. 

Trump nearly caused a civil war. And he's having a go at starting another one. 

He doesn't give a toss about the little people.
 

That isn’t the point.  Trump isn’t worried about you, you shouldn’t be worried about him.

 

The point is this the BBC deliberately manipulated a narrative and spliced two totally unrelated parts of a speech which was over an hour long in order to make it seem something it wasn’t.

 

Do you remember the Andrew Tate interview the BBC did whilst he was under house arrest in Romania?

 

They released a completely doctored version of the interview which was full of leading questions.

 

Andrew Tate had his own film crew there recording the whole interview.  The BBC took their interview down quick sharpish after Tate released his version.  He had an idea that is what they would do and sure enough The BBC were at it again.

 

They have also been questioned over their Anti Semetic reporting of the Gaza Israel conflict.  
 

The list goes on.  The only thing I look at the BBC for is their sport coverage.  At least they would have trouble fabricating a bunch of lies about that.

 

 

[Joe Newton]

On 05/11/2025 at 11:15, AHPP said:

 

I know what the political and legal landscape looks like. I'm clearly talking about what could be and should be. And importantly, until very recently, has been. People had these rights not very long ago at all.

 

I'm not interested in Darren and Sharron. I'm interested in me (and then people I like). Criminals who want guns get them. Or knives. And if someone's got a knife, I want a gun.

 

I don't mind if you find guns bulky and can't cope with how they fit with your cute autumn short jackets. I'm talking about individual rights. You do what you want. I'll do what I want. I could carry safely. Loads of people could (and do). My facebook feed last week was for some reason full of women's carrying systems. The memorable one was a full size appendix carry that didn't print in a skirt. The woman could carry a child at the same time etc.

 

I'll say it again. It comes down to individual rights. You can't see it working. Fine. You don't have to. But you (anyone) shouldn't be telling other people (via voting for politicians who would cage decent people for carrying to protect themselves) that they shouldn't be allowed to do something just because you don't think you're capable of it. You wouldn't try to drive if you were blind but you wouldn't then tell me I shouldn't drive with my good eyesight.

 

And yes, @Stubby. I didn't say anything about licensing. That's its own issue. https://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/about.htm

 

Alex, I like guns. I like pistols. If I lived in a place where handguns were commonly carried, I'd carry one to level the playing field.

 

In the UK concealable handguns are essentially restricted to police, armed forces and certain RFDs. If you open that up to the public every knife crime becomes a gun crime.

 

Can you tell me the last time a mass shooting was carried out in the UK with a handgun? I'm not aware of any since Dunblane, but i stand to be corrected.

 

 

[Mark J]

14 minutes ago, Rich Rule said:

That isn’t the point.  Trump isn’t worried about you, you shouldn’t be worried about him.

 

The point is this the BBC deliberately manipulated a narrative and spliced two totally unrelated parts of a speech which was over an hour long in order to make it seem something it wasn’t.

 

Do you remember the Andrew Tate interview the BBC did whilst he was under house arrest in Romania?

 

They released a completely doctored version of the interview which was full of leading questions.

 

Andrew Tate had his own film crew there recording the whole interview.  The BBC took their interview down quick sharpish after Tate released his version.  He had an idea that is what they would do and sure enough The BBC were at it again.

 

They have also been questioned over their Anti Semetic reporting of the Gaza Israel conflict.  
 

The list goes on.  The only thing I look at the BBC for is their sport coverage.  At least they would have trouble fabricating a bunch of lies about that.

 

 

Interesting framing. 

From my perspective, I see the BBC as being mostly right leaning. All that clatter with Corbyn juxtaposed with the Kremlin was no accident. 

There is a huge amount of money behind Andrew Tate, and it's not his money. 

BBC though, they do make some good nature shows, their local and national radio is top drawer, and sports coverage is canny too. 

Edited 58 minutes ago by Mark J