Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Two Rope Working Consultation


Tom D
 Share

Recommended Posts

There is certainly an amount of ambiguity and it needs to be clearer. @scotspine1 has interpreted it that a 2nd short line will suffice, which you CAN read into it. However, the reason the 2 line system is being enforced is because of numpties cutting ropes, poorly tied knots, dropping off ropes etc so to counteract that they insist on a 2nd line. So surely this 2nd line must be able to reach the floor without having to re anchor lower in the crown?

Should HSE turn up on site at any point and find 1 lifeline easily reaching the floor and one lifeline 30ft short, I, in my opinion, would not be surprised if he cried foul and called your 2nd line nothing more than a long lanyard.

When all this is written in stone I will be using 2 full length ropes, I suspect the hse will be out and about checking up, I don't want to be the test case.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

 
I’m not putting a large 30m MEWP on that tree for two reasons. That access road is very narrow which means the outriggers are going down onto soft ground even with large thick underpads I’m not doing it on principle. MEWPS are far from being the wonder solution to tree removal they’re often touted as. That’s coming from someone who’s used them on 100s+ of big dismantles where the ground was rock solid and perfectly flat. 
 
The second reason is that those trees were perfectly healthy and more than suitable for climbing. 
 
Felling from ground level was not an option. 
 
Been doing a fair bit of thinking on this two rope issue on recent climbs like this. Your thoughts occasionally turn to the feasibility of adding in a second line (3 in total) and all that entails. 
 
One major issue that’s not been brought up is that when you add an extra climbing system to your setup it will have a distracting effect on your ability to focus on the tree itself. 3 lines and the additional hardware will undoubtedly dominate your mind to the detriment of your focus on the tree itself and the actual job in hand. 
 
We need to think very carefully as an industry before we adopt this very prescriptive guidance by the HSE and AA who only ever talk in the abstract about our job from the comfort of their warm offices. 
 
E3F4D889-686C-41D7-9D06-37C80872D145.thumb.jpeg.2dc1f7d5f0d6ae24ce1dc5a7213b5746.jpeg
 

 


I agree with what you are saying with respect to work positioning. It seems like a very workable solution to be tied in twice and one that I have felt from the beginning of this whole debate is the solution.

What are your thoughts on rope access to the crown where currently we shoot up one rope and ascend? Will you put two ropes in ?

Thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stewmo said:

What are your thoughts on rope access to the crown where currently we shoot up one rope and ascend? Will you put two ropes in ?

 

On bigger trees,  twin wrench SRT lines will be the way forward for ascent and working in the tree. The ability to re-direct, move either of the static lines around stems and branches (whilst tied in with a lanyard) will be far easier than dragging two DdRT lines through the canopy.

 

Rope management will be a lot easier with two SRT lines and your bridge will be a lot less cluttered than it would be with two DdRT lines. 

 

You can operate two wrenches simultaneously with one hand for descent or branchwalking. 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will it though tim ? I think you are going to have to manage 120 metres of rope now on the average tree to keep it SRT and retrievable...for me SRT had been the answer to a lot of body damage from climbing and keeping me in the game.
I don’t like base anchors , I have seen and had a lot of top branches brake, which is fine as usually you only fall a few feet before the next crotch catches you but I will very rarely work a tree with a base anchor it’s too dangerous with debris and chainsaws so that means climbing from an isolated anchor which you need on the average 20 meter tree a 60 meter rope to set up a retrievable anchor so with a twin line system that’s 120 metres of rope to manage !
I do have a few ideas I’m going to play but I’m not relying on base anchors to get me out of this !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.