Youngster's ignorance of recent history.

[eggsarascal]

I ******* love the Internet. Somebody ranting against ignorance who doesn't even know the facts. Priceless!

 

The statement is fact.

 

Priceless when some one goes on about ranting when they don't know the facts.

[openspaceman]

I do know a lot about the Beetles,

 

Which is your favourite stag shield or dung?

[Gary Prentice]

I'd have to say stag

[felixthelogchopper]

I'd have to say stag

 

Old school VW for me.

[stihlmadasever]

Great thread with some hilarious comments

[spandit]

The statement is fact.

 

Priceless when some one goes on about ranting when they don't know the facts.

 

The statement is subject to semantic evaluation. It's like saying Sir Roger Moore didn't have any children because he was knighted after they were born. Anyway, 6 pages of replies for a really unimportant argument! That's value for money

[skyhuck]

The statement is subject to semantic evaluation. It's like saying Sir Roger Moore didn't have any children because he was knighted after they were born. Anyway, 6 pages of replies for a really unimportant argument! That's value for money

 

Your children continue to be your children long after they are born

[Stephen Blair]

Edward is the 3rd son, Andy is the 2nd.

 

 

Ha ha. The younger generation eh!

[Danny Boy]

I only know 2.4.D

 

sent from my phone but never in work time.

I must be "new gen" with my 2.4TD then 😄

 

Sent from my D6603 using Arbtalk mobile app

[spandit]

Your children continue to be your children long after they are born

 

I think you misunderstand my point. The OP is claiming that because Charles was born before Princess Elizabeth became Queen, her 3rd son, Edward, is the 2nd son born to Queen Elizabeth II. This is correct but also nonsensical. Anyway, I'm bored with this thread.