josharb87

One name is tounge and groove felling cut

Press the youtube tab matty to watch it on youtube. Really enjoyed the first video Alex, first one in a long time, and the editing from 1:35 in time with the music 2nd video, do your customers keep the wood and branches? Is that why you didn't use the crane to take the tree out to the road? Really like the honest work style!

I think your comment was in jest, but looking at the specs it would!

At 45hp (19 more than your 528) and 550kg higher tipping load capacity, (1500kg as opposed to the 528s 950) isn't it more equivilant to an Avant 745 (45hp) or maybe size wise a 640?

Surprised theres a discussion about it TBH!

I used to use a Giant 203, possibly tougher than an avant as it was all metal, which was good as it tipped over for fun, the wheels could be turned around though to widen it a bit. I didn't like the levers, every movement was a separate lever, where as the avant were all on the joystick. New ones might be different. Gianni Ferrari is also a similar loader to avant and multione, has a premium price here, but really liked it. can't remember the model, but must have been similar size to a 5 series avant. Then theres Norcar, another Finnish brand, same principle as avant, sf etc, but has an oscillating central pivot like the older Multiones is a big plus. Never used one though. IME of mini loaders, the biggest factor is the wheels, the solid yard wheels like you get on forklift trucks in warehouses are USELESS for arb work, turf tyres are fine if its dry, you want nice wide tractor profile tyres which have a bit of bounce and give in them. The extra width really improves the machines stability, downside is the extra width if access is narrow.

Machine specs with lifting capacity and tipping load, stick a bigger more powerful ram in and of assume it'd be able to lift more but still tip at the previous weight

Yes, on a 635 (twisted the boom out of the bearings) Spoke to a guy who made the norcar tracks, he explained (which I've half forgot) the difference in stated lift capacity and tipping weight, tipping weight is if I remember correctly the weight the machine will lift before rear wheels come off the ground, so tipping capacity is more important than what the loader would lift with the rear of the machine was chained down.

I talked to Jesper at Nordik greenteeth about a 2250 he had for sale with about 350 hours on it, we spoke about what i do and currently use (new version vermeer 252, 27hp belt driven) and he said i'd be disappointed with the 2250. (I was disappointed at the 27hp hydraulic drive vermeer FWIW) I liked that honesty. So it would make sense in my mind that if Ty is considering larger HP machines, or even the 252, then the 2250 would be too small for him too.

RE the 2250 Bandit, I use the vermeer 252 a lot, on hearing this the bandit dealer wouldn't sell me a used 2250 he had as he said id be disappointed!

Depends on nut and bolt size 310 for my 530

Can't remember tbh Paul

Looks great for the right application, like chipping, hundreds of kg quickly rather than thousands slowly Smaller scale than the bio mass stuff here

Crikey! Gusting hard up here.

What do you want to know?

Thats probably the main reason i went SE!

If access allowed yes (OP mentioned fences could be removed) My reasonings: Costs (with operator) £100 more than a groundy. Others on here have mentioned chucking "a load" of guys at the job. This sounds more expensive, although more inside the box thinking. "A load" of guys would frustrate me. Id get frustrated at the ones not pulling their weight. Just because its designed to work in the woods shifting cord doesn't mean it can't be used in a garden shifting branches! Its far more viable IMO than a quad-quads are useless at dragging stuff up hill and would need to do many more trips to extract everything. The alstor is great at shifting loads up hill in comparison. Someone mentioned a mini digger.....that would need hundreds of very slow trips to get everything out. No faffing around winching trees and branches up, maybe redirecting and winching again, dragging to final resting place, manually stacking. Winching here sounds slow imo. no manual handling - crane, grab and rotator does most the work. I don't have access to petrol winches, or any decent winch tbh. Felling and shifting everything looks like an easy day for 2 guys and the machine. And IMO the most cost effective option. However, i don't know the uk prices or availability of Alstors, and i wouldn't own one-too expensive and unreliable!

Steady on sweetheart Whats an argocat got to do with anything???? Completely different type of machine. A simple google search would have pointed that out to you. I said kit available TO ME and the OP was looking at alternate ideas. The alstor (with driver) costs me about £100 more than a groundy, for the day. So perfectly viable imo.

If you say you can remove part of the fence then do it! With the kit i have available, id remove as much fence as needed, fell everything and rent in an Alstor 8x8 mini forwarder to shift everything out the garden. maybe some ply sheets to cover the patio (from rubber tyre marks)

They have a Scandinavian dealer (Denmark) but i would guess (going on past experience of another make here) they will have some sort of agreement that a uk new machine sale has to go through a uk dealer unfortunately

Reading between the lines on other threads marc has commented on, you're in a bit of a catch 22 situation, very specialist machine for the uk, one(?) dealer, that in the future you'd want good back up/service from, lawyers might burn this relationship. Sounds disgraceful tbh.

I would assume then that the tow ball weight you mention is the maximum recommended nose weight standing still on level ground. Bit like your axle ratings, go over a bump fully loaded+weight of trailer and you'll easily go over 3.5t for a moment

When braking a correctly loaded trailer should be pushing into the vehicle, not pushing down surely? Bob, is that for HGV's or light /sub3.5t trailers too? I know that here (normally the same EU licence specifications) sub 3.5t trailers can be a maximum of 2.6m wide, with side overhang of load 20cm per side included in that 2.6m. then theres also the visibility from the mirrors to factor in.

Not being funny, but it sounds like you ARE one of them!