-
Posts
3,827 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Freelancers directory
Everything posted by Chris Sheppard
-
<p>Cool, I'm sure you'll be happy with it. I can't see any reason your Dexta wouldn't handle it - when I worked for Riko we used to put the 35e's on the back of even the tiny AGT 835's</p>
-
<p>Hi Ben, </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Yes, on a 2840, no weights but a front loader and heavier duty whees and tyres each end.</p>
-
<p>Hi Ben,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I think part of it is that the igland goes through 2 pulleys whereas the krpan and uniforest only go through one (but with an optional bottom pulley), but also that you can get a lot more weight behind the operating lever compared to the igland (though the igland will be around 10 years old now so the design may have changed).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>From what I remember, we never bent the igland, but it was much thinner grade steel and as the butt plate was a lot narrower, it never bit in like the krpan does.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'd be happy with either, but the krpan, in my opinion, is the better one for production work and fits a more conventional shaped tractor back end, whereas the igland suits the smaller compacts a bit better (or did when we had one).</p>
-
<p>Hi Ben, </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It was a good little winch and well suited to the geometry of the back end of smaller tractors (especially something like an alpine), as well as being quite light.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We'd used it mostly on the back of a 30hp Landini 4wd but replaced it with a 3.5T Krpan a couple of years ago. The Krpan's a lot stronger (but heavier), but also pulls a lot better, despite only being 0.3t higher rated pull.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If you're buying new, I'd go look at the Krpan or Uniforest as they'll more than likely still be more winch for less cost.</p>