Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, Mark J said:

The problem with "Tommy Robinson" is that he's shot himself in the foot with this one.

 

Nonces of any creed or colour should be his target.  Not just the Asian ones.

 

It's nothing to do with freedom of speech.

 

He was on a suspended sentence for doing exectly what he was just nicked for. Hence the near immediate Contempt of Court hearing that sent him to jail to serve the suspended sentence.  He's potentially created a situation that will allow the nonces to call for a mistrial.

 

Tommy Robinson doesn't give a fuck about the victims of these crimes.  If he did he wouldn't jeopardise the outcome of the trials for his own fame game.

 

 

 

 

 

We’re able to agree again Mark!

 

i agree with you that he (probably) doesn’t have a deep personal concern for the specified victims of the crimes which are subject to the current trial. 

 

Im just guessing, but I’d suggest it’s more likely than not that he doesn’t actually KNOW the victims, he may do, but on the balance of probabilities- well, you know what I mean....

 

Its not so much about the victims as it is about the systemic (I would say failures, but they are not failures, they were by design) attitudes, behaviours and omissions which have created the environment where certain demographics have been allowed to behave with impunity within a society they hold in contempt. 

 

A camera outside a court after a jury has been appointed and a trial has commenced is likely to jeopardise the trial how exactly?  Your only justification is over dramatic and (IMHO) clouded by your dislike of the personalities involved. 

 

Why are the other journ’os that merely reported the existence of the trial similarly not incarcerated?

 

Why is reporting of the existence of the trial so secret?

 

Who actually wins from this scenario? 

 

By arresting him, the profile created has done MORE to raise the profile of the trial - and focus public attention than would have NOT arresting him!

 

I genuinely wonder who has “played” who in this one! 

 

1 fairly mediocre male, from humble working class origins, raising the hopes, dreams and fears of the masses against the combined authority, education, wealth and power of the establishment- a true David and Goliath scenario of proletariat rebellion - how can this NOT be right up your alley???

 

 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
7 hours ago, Mark J said:

No, Tommy is a prisoner these days.

Maybe, no thanks to a corrupt miss'use of the D Notice system to get him there...

 

Can you explain why Tommy is a national security risk?....... No nether can I.

 

What right has a judge to deem Tommy a national security risk?..  I can't think of any other than the judge is corrupt and morally bankrupt..  the man next up in the dock ought be that judge whoever he is..  he has overstepped his jurisdiction  and should without delay disbarred or jailed..

 

He has brought the judiciary into dispute..  

 

Further, this prick is gonna make Tommy Robinson a hero for many.   he is the victim of a justice system better fitted to Erdogan's Turkey and not Great Britain..  The gestapo and KGB would be proud of us right now..

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

And there are 450,000 people (and growing) that agree with you Vesp! 

 

Its as he himself has predicted, and as has has been independently verified by so called respected investigative journalism and prison inspection reports, put him in gaol enough times and he will be done in by another consequence of systemic failure, the fanatics of the Muslim gangs that control the prison system. 

Edited by kevinjohnsonmbe
  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

And there are 450,000 people (and growing) that agree with you Vesp! 

 

Its as he himself has predicted, and as has has been independently verified by so called respected investigative journalism and prison inspection reports, put him in goal enough times and he will be done in by another consequence of systemic failure, the fanatics of the Muslim gangs that control the prison system. 

Yea and I've just added one more....

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Mark J said:

I don't disagree with many of Jordan Petersons views.  I am however aware that he's only recently been elevated to the status of a popular thinker.  He makes valid points: https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/03/19/jordan-peterson-and-fascist-mysticism/

 

Disinformation is rife.  I suspect that the powers that be are doing their best to drive wedges between us.  And they're succeeding by the looks of things.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

We’re able to agree again Mark!

 

i agree with you that he (probably) doesn’t have a deep personal concern for the specified victims of the crimes which are subject to the current trial. 

 

Im just guessing, but I’d suggest it’s more likely than not that he doesn’t actually KNOW the victims, he may do, but on the balance of probabilities- well, you know what I mean....

 

Its not so much about the victims as it is about the systemic (I would say failures, but they are not failures, they were by design) attitudes, behaviours and omissions which have created the environment where certain demographics have been allowed to behave with impunity within a society they hold in contempt. 

 

A camera outside a court after a jury has been appointed and a trial has commenced is likely to jeopardise the trial how exactly?  Your only justification is over dramatic and (IMHO) clouded by your dislike of the personalities involved.  

 

Why are the other journ’os that merely reported the existence of the trial similarly not incarcerated?

 

Why is reporting of the existence of the trial so secret?

 

Who actually wins from this scenario? 

 

By arresting him, the profile created has done MORE to raise the profile of the trial - and focus public attention than would have NOT arresting him!

 

I genuinely wonder who has “played” who in this one! 

 

1 fairly mediocre male, from humble working class origins, raising the hopes, dreams and fears of the masses against the combined authority, education, wealth and power of the establishment- a true David and Goliath scenario of proletariat rebellion - how can this NOT be right up your alley???

 

 

He broke the law.  Right or wrong, that's what he did.

Posted
2 hours ago, felixthelogchopper said:

Oversimplified codswallop..

 

Not to mention why the D'notice..     the D notice was designed to protect Britain and its people during times of war..  

 

are we at war?...  this is a clear miss use of war time legislation..   not to mention its goes against the grain of English law.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

For anybody who doesn't know, the Southend News Network is a spoof news website who specialise in ridiculing stories by reducing them to the absurd or just plainly treating them as nonsense  . Amusingly, their 'exclusives' have been reported as fact more than once by Britain First and similar.

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.