Making the news today....

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

On 22/07/2021 at 01:53, Mark J said:

I do think that it would be better to deal with the incumbent criminals before we deal with the historical ones.

What about statues? 😂

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

12 hours ago, PeteB said:

Yaxley-Lennon got stiffed in court,

Shocker - private individual speaks truth to power and gets royally shafted by the very system that he seeks to expose. 

[sime42]

Fat fingered

[sime42]

Shocker - private individual speaks truth to power and gets royally shafted by the very system that he seeks to expose. 

...... or exploit.

[Mark J]

7 hours ago, Commando said:

So she’s not a criminal Wolfie….I mean Mark!🤣
Just because you smash the parasitic marxist NUM, and take a hard line on the terrorist scum in NI doesn’t make you a criminal…..
“South American countries” shining a light for freedom and democracy!! WTF 🤡

Bravo:
 

 

[Mark J]

3 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

What about statues? 😂

I think that most of them are a waste of talent.
 

[eggsarascal]

3 hours ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Shocker - private individual speaks truth to power and gets royally shafted by the very system that he seeks to expose. 

Don't worry he's being crowdfunded by his followers to pay his fine and costs... Which if I was snide I'd read as, "Thousands of racists are giving a Syrian refugee their money"...

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

14 minutes ago, eggsarascal said:

Don't worry he's being crowdfunded by his followers to pay his fine and costs... Which if I was snide I'd read as, "Thousands of racists are giving a Syrian refugee their money"...

Yeah, for sure, that’s ‘one’ way of interpreting it Egger 🤪

 

Another might be - through fundamental freedom of choice, some people that happen to acknowledge or even agree that the job that person does represents a reflection of their own views which are suppressed elsewhere - whether in part or whole - and they are happy to demonstrate their agreement through entirely voluntary cash contribution. 
 

Oddly, it is exactly this degree of freedom of choice which is demonstrated the length & breadth of the country through procurement of a FC season ticket, through subscription or purchase of  any specific newspaper, through subscription to any political party, it’s even evident as low down the daily spectrum as which brand of bread or beer we buy and the pubs, clubs, restaurants and take-aways we choose to patronise. 
 

We don’t buy or want what we don’t like and nobody can make us - just one of the fundamental freedoms we enjoy. Another is that anyone that does like what we don’t is free to indulge if they choose to. 
 

If you don’t like it, don’t buy it (not like I think I need to say that to you BTW) but there are those that think they have some sort of right to tell others what they should or shouldn’t subscribe to. 
 

They can FRO as far as I’m concerned. 

[eggsarascal]

9 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Yeah, for sure, that’s ‘one’ way of interpreting it Egger 🤪

 

Another might be - through fundamental freedom of choice, some people that happen to acknowledge or even agree that the job that person does represents a reflection of their own views which are suppressed elsewhere - whether in part or whole - and they are happy to demonstrate their agreement through entirely voluntary cash contribution. 
 

Oddly, it is exactly this degree of freedom of choice which is demonstrated the length & breadth of the country through procurement of a FC season ticket, through subscription or purchase of  any specific newspaper, through subscription to any political party, it’s even evident as low down the daily spectrum as which brand of bread or beer we buy and the pubs, clubs, restaurants and take-aways we choose to patronise. 
 

We don’t buy or want what we don’t like and nobody can make us - just one of the fundamental freedoms we enjoy. Another is that anyone that does like what we don’t is free to indulge if they choose to. 
 

If you don’t like it, don’t buy it (not like I think I need to say that to you BTW) but there are those that think they have some sort of right to tell others what they should or shouldn’t subscribe to. 
 

They can FRO as far as I’m concerned. 

The last I saw the crowdfunding had raised £200, that was donated by someone who goes by the username KJ...

[sime42]

Yeah, for sure, that’s ‘one’ way of interpreting it Egger 🤪
 
Another might be - through fundamental freedom of choice, some people that happen to acknowledge or even agree that the job that person does represents a reflection of their own views which are suppressed elsewhere - whether in part or whole - and they are happy to demonstrate their agreement through entirely voluntary cash contribution. 
 
Oddly, it is exactly this degree of freedom of choice which is demonstrated the length & breadth of the country through procurement of a FC season ticket, through subscription or purchase of  any specific newspaper, through subscription to any political party, it’s even evident as low down the daily spectrum as which brand of bread or beer we buy and the pubs, clubs, restaurants and take-aways we choose to patronise. 
 
We don’t buy or want what we don’t like and nobody can make us - just one of the fundamental freedoms we enjoy. Another is that anyone that does like what we don’t is free to indulge if they choose to. 
 
If you don’t like it, don’t buy it (not like I think I need to say that to you BTW) but there are those that think they have some sort of right to tell others what they should or shouldn’t subscribe to. 
 
They can FRO as far as I’m concerned. 

Can we have that in a more concise form please? [emoji848]