Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Aggravated trespass.- reasonable force. 

 

The ‘task’ should not have fallen to him, but it did. 

 

Im sympathetic to the environmental cause but taking ‘direct action’ and then crying like a beeee-ach when it results in reciprocated direct action simply illustrates the self entitled, do as I say not as I do, whiny, pathetic attitude of such people. 

 

There are a few SJWs complaining (the usual suspects), but the overwhelming public response appears to be supportive. My only criticism is the apology. 

 

 

  • Like 7
  • Sad 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, eggsarascal said:

Hang on, Mark field is one of those who supports revoking article 50, deserves all he gets.... Should lock him up and throw away the key...

You've fallen into the trap me old scrambled egg!

 

It shouldn't matter who he is or what he stands for...

 

There are those amongst us that have overtly delighted in the violent action of casting a milk shake over a serving MEP and prominent public figure.  They are 'likely' the same cohort that (quite rightly) expressed horror at the murder of a serving MP, or outrage at the poorly judged comments obliquely referencing rape as a measure of a female MP's desirability.

 

Here in lies the hypocrisy which was previously referenced (and apparently wholly misinterpreted.)

 

Having a set of 'standards' which can so easily be discarded - dependent upon the political leanings of subject / victim / perp - is the very epitome of hypocrisy...  At least it is by my moral ?  

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

You've fallen into the trap me old scrambled egg!

 

It shouldn't matter who he is or what he stands for...

 

There are those amongst us that have overtly delighted in the violent action of casting a milk shake over a serving MEP and prominent public figure.  They are 'likely' the same cohort that (quite rightly) expressed horror at the murder of a serving MP, or outrage at the poorly judged comments obliquely referencing rape as a measure of a female MP's desirability.

 

Here in lies the hypocrisy which was previously referenced (and apparently wholly misinterpreted.)

 

Having a set of 'standards' which can so easily be discarded - dependent upon the political leanings of subject / victim / perp - is the very epitome of hypocrisy...  At least it is by my moral ?  

I haven't fallen into any trap, I was joking.

 

You know me well enough to realise the very hypocrisy you speak of gets right on my wick.

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.