Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
Doing what exactly?...

Chatting shat! Magistrates courts and self representation..... not too long ago before your banishing you admitted to talking shite about your jail time, so how does anyone know your chatting legit now???! “The boy who cried wolf” ring any bells?!

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
1 minute ago, Ratman said:


Chatting shat! Magistrates courts and self representation..... not too long ago before your banishing you admitted to talking shite about your jail time, so how does anyone know your chatting legit now???! “The boy who cried wolf” ring any bells?!

I think we've all been to the magistrates Ratman, I've been several times over the yrs..  typical shite, drunk and disorderly car tax insurance and girlfriend problems..    we've all done it. me included..  mostly in my twenties to be honest..    

Posted
4 minutes ago, Big J said:

In the New Years Honours list, I for one am very happy for Sir Michael Palin. Someone who I've always admired and in that rose tinted alternate reality where Sir David Attenborough was World President, Palin would probably make an ideal deputy :D 

 

 

And Monty Python the house of Lords :D

Posted
3 hours ago, difflock said:

O.K.

I score 2 out of Vesp's 3 essential  court appearances.

1 in my late teens, the other in my late 50's

Does that make me a bad person?

marcus

3 essential court appearances....   ha that made me laugh..?

 

I'm left wondering in what order by timeline...   

Posted
15 hours ago, eggsarascal said:

Isn't it funny when the boots on the other foot.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2018/dec/27/its-completely-wrong-falsely-accused-tory-mp-attacks-legal-aid-cuts

 

This tw@t was one of the big hitters in getting legal aid almost done away with. Now he's had a >£100k legal bill, with no way of getting his money back, (even though he's innocent) he doesn't like it.

He wasn’t found guilty ??s. 

 

Im not so sure that naturally equates to “innocent” however, just that there was insufficient evidence to satisfy the “beyond reasonable doubt.”

Posted
24 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

He wasn’t found guilty ??s. 

 

Im not so sure that naturally equates to “innocent” however, just that there was insufficient evidence to satisfy the “beyond reasonable doubt.”

You knew what I meant.

 

Anyway he ain't getting his money back.

Posted

Hot off the presses ....Vesp back for a couple of days and already going to compile a list of whats wrong with this site and send it to Steve?

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.