Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Making the news today....


Mick Dempsey

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Mark Bolam said:

The French royal family obviously cost zero.
Their palaces, art galleries and vast estates still exist and have more visitors than any country on earth, generating huge revenues, so the actual royals are surplus to requirements it would seem.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

44 minutes ago, 5thelement said:

The French royal family obviously cost zero.
Their palaces, art galleries and vast estates still exist and have more visitors than any country on earth, generating huge revenues, so the actual royals are surplus to requirements it would seem.

Very true but I do think the manner in which the French got rid of their Monarchy might have something to do with how it’s captured people’s imagination over the years. Not quite sure if it would be anywhere near as dramatic if it ever occurs here. Probably a weak willed arrangement somewhat like the Queen's tax deal a few years back, the same one that avoided Chuck paying inheritance tax recently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 5thelement said:

The French royal family obviously cost zero.
Their palaces, art galleries and vast estates still exist and have more visitors than any country on earth, generating huge revenues, so the actual royals are surplus to requirements it would seem.

 

Good point, but I don’t think gaining £90m to potentially lose £1.7bn is worth the risk.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mark J said:

I can't see the benefit of them financially, it seems ridiculous to me have a royal family in 2023, I reckon they should get jobs or sign on the dole.

I grew up on Deeside, next door to Deeside is Donside. 

 

One of the river valleys has a choice of cafés in every village, hotels galore, tourist attractions, bike hire shops and caravan parks. All of these providing employment and income for the local population. 

 

On the other river you're lucky to find one café in a village let alone have a choice. The few hotels are thread bare and struggling to survive. The upper reaches are sparsely populated by folk scraping a living from hill sheep crofts.

 

The difference is Balmoral and the royal influence. The tourists that visit the Royal residence bring a huge amount of much needed money to a relatively remote local economy. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackalope said:

I grew up on Deeside, next door to Deeside is Donside. 

 

One of the river valleys has a choice of cafés in every village, hotels galore, tourist attractions, bike hire shops and caravan parks. All of these providing employment and income for the local population. 

 

On the other river you're lucky to find one café in a village let alone have a choice. The few hotels are thread bare and struggling to survive. The upper reaches are sparsely populated by folk scraping a living from hill sheep crofts.

 

The difference is Balmoral and the royal influence. The tourists that visit the Royal residence bring a huge amount of much needed money to a relatively remote local economy. 

Aye but they'd go there even without the royal family, it's not as if they get a selfie with them. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 03/05/2023 at 20:40, Doug Tait said:

Scottish lad has had a trip down to the Cotswolds on his BMX with Red Bull.

 

 

I thought that was going to be Daniel MacAskill, it's the crazy kind of stunt that he pulls. Undoubtedly impressive but you've got to ask why. I think Red Bull have more money than sense sometimes, but maybe it's all just good marketing and promotion.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Aye but they'd go there even without the royal family, it's not as if they get a selfie with them. 

 

Can you imagine the area round Balmoral etc. getting the interest it does without the Monarchy?

 

Fast forward 20 years.

 

It wouldn’t be the same mate.

That’s jobs lost.

 

I’m not saying it’s right, but as Jackalope says, it’s the way it is.

 

Hope you’re well mate.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.