Making the news today....

[AHPP]

2 hours ago, Doug Tait said:

 

Not disagreeing with the sentiment Dave, when I saw the clip of them being recaptured they were like a couple of shit scared little kittens, looking towards the headtorches hoping to be saved, but I'd be interested to know why one died.

Exposure, eaten something bad, shock?

They didn't look to be injured.

 

To send a message.

[Mike Hill]

How far this goes back ,is quite horrible 

•  

 

How Rotherham bosses have reinvented themselves since grooming scandal

Council leaders criticised in inquiries into child sexual exploitation have become government advisers and executive coaches

The 2014 Jay report condemned senior managers for having “underplayed” the scale of the “appalling” abuse faced by girls — some as young as 11 — at the hands of men mainly of Pakistani heritage between 1997 and 2013. It found there had been “blatant” collective failures by the council’s leadership.

Sonia Sharp

Sonia Sharp led Rotherham’s children’s department from 2005 to 2008. She has acknowledged and apologised for its failure to protect girls, admitting that her department “knew there were many children in the community at risk and feared that this was the tip of an iceberg”.

After leaving Rotherham, Sharp worked for Sheffield council before moving to Australia in 2012 where she was responsible for running education services in the state of Victoria.

Today, Sharp is a partner at the consultancy EY Australia, where she “provides bespoke advice to state and territory governments” on “human and social services challenges”.
 

Ged Fitzgerald

Ged Fitzgerald, who was criticised for “missing opportunities” to tackle grooming while chief executive of Rotherham council between 2001 and 2003, has rebranded himself as an “executive coach and mentor”.

A report commissioned by Rotherham council and published in 2017 concluded that a more “rigorous” approach by Fitzgerald could have resulted in a “very different” response to child sexual exploitation at the time.

Fitzgerald went on to serve as chief executive of Sunderland city council, Lancashire county council and Liverpool city council. In May 2017 he was arrested as part of an investigation into financial irregularities during his tenure at Lancashire county council and resigned from his position at Liverpool council the following year.

In August 2022 he was charged with misconduct in public office and procuring the misconduct of others, related to alleged activities at Liverpool and Lancashire councils.

While on bail he has transitioned into executive coaching, becoming a certified member of the European Mentoring and Coaching Council.

Jahangir Akhtar

Jahangir Akhtar was described in a 2015 report on the council by Louise Casey as an intimidating and “powerful figure” in Rotherham politics, thought to have “influence that extended to the police”.

The Jay report suggested that Akhtar, who served as deputy leader of the council and vice-chairman of the South Yorkshire police and crime panel, may have chosen to ignore a “politically inconvenient truth” when he claimed not to have realised that there was a “deep-rooted problem of Pakistani-heritage perpetrators targeting young white girls”.

Today Akhtar works for the bank Santander and is a registered director of a social enterprise based at a Rotherham mosque that provides “educational support services” and “social work activities”.

Suspended by the Labour Party in 2014, he continues to take a keen interest in politics and started a TikTok channel where he posted “unfiltered” commentary on various issues, particularly the war in Gaza.

In full (paywalled) hopefully the start of a very, very long running 'where are they now' Times series
 

 

[Johnsond]

4 hours ago, Mike Hill said:

How far this goes back ,is quite horrible 

•  

 

How Rotherham bosses have reinvented themselves since grooming scandal

Council leaders criticised in inquiries into child sexual exploitation have become government advisers and executive coaches

The 2014 Jay report condemned senior managers for having “underplayed” the scale of the “appalling” abuse faced by girls — some as young as 11 — at the hands of men mainly of Pakistani heritage between 1997 and 2013. It found there had been “blatant” collective failures by the council’s leadership.

Sonia Sharp

Sonia Sharp led Rotherham’s children’s department from 2005 to 2008. She has acknowledged and apologised for its failure to protect girls, admitting that her department “knew there were many children in the community at risk and feared that this was the tip of an iceberg”.

After leaving Rotherham, Sharp worked for Sheffield council before moving to Australia in 2012 where she was responsible for running education services in the state of Victoria.

Today, Sharp is a partner at the consultancy EY Australia, where she “provides bespoke advice to state and territory governments” on “human and social services challenges”.
 

Ged Fitzgerald

Ged Fitzgerald, who was criticised for “missing opportunities” to tackle grooming while chief executive of Rotherham council between 2001 and 2003, has rebranded himself as an “executive coach and mentor”.

A report commissioned by Rotherham council and published in 2017 concluded that a more “rigorous” approach by Fitzgerald could have resulted in a “very different” response to child sexual exploitation at the time.

Fitzgerald went on to serve as chief executive of Sunderland city council, Lancashire county council and Liverpool city council. In May 2017 he was arrested as part of an investigation into financial irregularities during his tenure at Lancashire county council and resigned from his position at Liverpool council the following year.

In August 2022 he was charged with misconduct in public office and procuring the misconduct of others, related to alleged activities at Liverpool and Lancashire councils.

While on bail he has transitioned into executive coaching, becoming a certified member of the European Mentoring and Coaching Council.

Jahangir Akhtar

Jahangir Akhtar was described in a 2015 report on the council by Louise Casey as an intimidating and “powerful figure” in Rotherham politics, thought to have “influence that extended to the police”.

The Jay report suggested that Akhtar, who served as deputy leader of the council and vice-chairman of the South Yorkshire police and crime panel, may have chosen to ignore a “politically inconvenient truth” when he claimed not to have realised that there was a “deep-rooted problem of Pakistani-heritage perpetrators targeting young white girls”.

Today Akhtar works for the bank Santander and is a registered director of a social enterprise based at a Rotherham mosque that provides “educational support services” and “social work activities”.

Suspended by the Labour Party in 2014, he continues to take a keen interest in politics and started a TikTok channel where he posted “unfiltered” commentary on various issues, particularly the war in Gaza.

In full (paywalled) hopefully the start of a very, very long running 'where are they now' Times series
 

 

🤷‍♂️

To say he had no knowledge is laughable. Take a look at some of his cases prior to taking up the role at the CPS. That tells you all you need to know about his character. 

Edited January 12 by Johnsond

[Mike Hill]

This is pretty accurate 

 

 

[Mesterh]

An inquiry would just kick the can down the road for the next 7 years. You need to ask why that would be more Preferable? Nothing to hide maybe.

How about we act now and put measures into place, reform will do an inquiry that will surely weed out any wrong doings although its already been highlighted that police didnt believe the kids and measures weren't put into place due to the possible racist back lash. I say fck to the backlash and deal with that when  it arises and listen and act on the kids who come asking for help.

 

No one brought this up 2 years when the tories did the same thing to Oldaham council, they asked for an inquiry but were told no. No one battered an eyelid or called for the UK to be liberated or for certain people to be jailed. Its just a lot of Musk ball sucking and no real call for action.

 

 

 

[Steven P]

The link has gone now, but I saw a brilliant one at the end of the news pages yesterday, a bit of lighter relief...

 

Apparently 'ladies toys' can be operated remotely by internet, wifies and bluetooth... but have no internet security and virus checkers (you make your own jokes there). Hackers can take control of them if they wanted to... so be warned...

 

It amused me anyway.

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Steven P said:

The link has gone now, but I saw a brilliant one at the end of the news pages yesterday, a bit of lighter relief...

 

Apparently 'ladies toys' can be operated remotely by internet, wifies and bluetooth... but have no internet security and virus checkers (you make your own jokes there). Hackers can take control of them if they wanted to... so be warned...

 

It amused me anyway.

It amused you did it SP 😳😳

Why are you warning what I presume is mainly blokes on here, an arborist forum as you often point out about the risk of “ Women’s “ sex toys being hacked and running wild. 
SP is this some kind of weird fantasy you have somehow built up the courage to post online. Seriously if ramming a rampant rabbit up your arse posting it online and hoping some fellow weirdo hacks into it and sends you to SP slack arse anal  heaven is your thing then  I’d say this might not be the place to broadcast it. 
I always had my doubts about you but fair play for trying to live the life you want. 

[peds]

Jesus Christ, what a f*cking barrel of laughs you are.

[Johnsond]

16 minutes ago, peds said:

Jesus Christ, what a f*cking barrel of laughs you are.

😂😂😂 To coin a phrase “ it amused me anyway”. 
 

[Mark J]

1 hour ago, Johnsond said:

It amused you did it SP 😳😳

Why are you warning what I presume is mainly blokes on here, an arborist forum as you often point out about the risk of “ Women’s “ sex toys being hacked and running wild. 
SP is this some kind of weird fantasy you have somehow built up the courage to post online. Seriously if ramming a rampant rabbit up your arse posting it online and hoping some fellow weirdo hacks into it and sends you to SP slack arse anal  heaven is your thing then  I’d say this might not be the place to broadcast it. 
I always had my doubts about you but fair play for trying to live the life you want. 

I  dunno like, I'd deffo fire that thing up remotely. Any hole's a goal... Giddyurp! etc.