Making the news today....

[Steven P]

11 hours ago, Johnsond said:

Sunak’s plans to build 100,000 more homes blocked by Labour in House of Lords

APPLE.NEWS

---

RISHI Sunak’s hopes of building 100,000 more homes were crushed last night after Labour blocked...

 

 

D'oh, all that effort to try to get you to read the numbers. There are more Conservative members of the House of Lords than Labour (261 to 174), this bill wasn't blocked by 'Labour in the House of Lords" - I'd have to read the voting figures but suspect that all sides of the House of Lords voted against this.....or the Labour Lords have worked out a way to clone themselves.

[Johnsond]

30 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

I might paraphrase this "Labour has worked out that it isn't those pesky Belgians that we don't like, citizens of the EU are actually OK"

Actually I quite admire the Belgian approach to the whole immigrant situation, we would do well to adopt some of the methods they have in place. 

[Johnsond]

26 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

D'oh, all that effort to try to get you to read the numbers. There are more Conservative members of the House of Lords than Labour (261 to 174), this bill wasn't blocked by 'Labour in the House of Lords" - I'd have to read the voting figures but suspect that all sides of the House of Lords voted against this.....or the Labour Lords have worked out a way to clone themselves.

Enlighten me to this effort in your head that you’ve apparently put into getting me to look at what figures ???????? 

[Steven P]

7 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Enlighten me to this effort in your head that you’ve apparently put into getting me to look at what figures ???????? 

 

Go back a week or so and your sudden change of tune when I pointed out that 'legal' or economic migration to the UK far outweighed the 'illegal' asylum seeker migration to the UK by a factor of about 8..... I suspect that we did immigration to death then, am looking for the next mark on my 'Daily Mail Rage Bingo' - can't you bang on about the Nanny state?

 

Always fact check the internet, some sites are worth fact checking more than others.

[peds]

Er, I think you'll find, Steven, that fact checking is a leftist conspiracy to discredit the right, and should be avoided at all costs to ensure a steady grip on the reins of political power.

[Steven P]

1 hour ago, peds said:

Er, I think you'll find, Steven, that fact checking is a leftist conspiracy to discredit the right, and should be avoided at all costs to ensure a steady grip on the reins of political power.

 

Ahh, FFS I've done it again haven't I? Sorry.

[Johnsond]

It’s good to see the cuck crew back together two more and you will have a full quartet laughing and liking  each others delusions  👍.

Where  did I change my tune ?? I commented on  illegal vs legal vetted immigration. The change of tune is whatever the song that’s playing in your head it would seem, anyway  from that we somehow ended up with you guys getting semis on, fantasising about watching immigrants hump your mrs in order to sort out your self confessed weak gene, anyway I have to go and see a guy about a new sawmill so won’t be around for a few hrs in the meantime get the rest of the cuck crew fired up and I’ll catch you later 👍

Edited September 14, 2023 by Johnsond

[peds]

[Johnsond]

2 hours ago, Steven P said:

 

D'oh, all that effort to try to get you to read the numbers. There are more Conservative members of the House of Lords than Labour (261 to 174), this bill wasn't blocked by 'Labour in the House of Lords" - I'd have to read the voting figures but suspect that all sides of the House of Lords voted against this.....or the Labour Lords have worked out a way to clone themselves.

🤷‍♂️

[Steven P]

2 hours ago, Johnsond said:

🤷‍♂️

 

 

That's the one, so the article said that the Labour peers blocked a bill by 206 votes (I think that was the number I read) with 174 members, not all of them turned up to vote, how is that possible ?