Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 hours ago, Mick Dempsey said:

I don’t mind them, as long as, like the Queen and Phillip they work for the country.

Nothing wrong with a bit of anachronism, the world is in too much of a hurry to assimilate and all be the same.

They’re only one bad monarch from blowing it though.

I'm not a royalists as such but I'd far rather live in a constitutional monarchy than a republic. Politics and politicians are hugely divisive. It's seems much better to me that the head of state should be above politics. 

President Boris, President Blair, President Thatcher or President Corbyn? Really..? Isn't there enough bitterness already?

 

A constitutional monarchy should be just that though. The clue is in the title. It's constitutional monarchy, not constitutional dynasty. The monarch and heir are the only ones that count. The rest should be title-less, paddle their own canoes through life and work for a living, without troubling the rest of us for subsidised housing, personal protection or free luxury transport. And without constantly taking to lecterns or TV screens to patronise us on the latest fashionable cause. We know that having a mental illness or being nasty to women is bad news and we don't need over-privileged public school boys or washed up B list actresses to point out the obvious.   

 

Otherwise, crack on your majesty and keep Philip away from the car keys. 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

seems We are ruled over by the same old nonsense ,  I love the remark by scots comic' oh yea, Prince Harry , flying over Afghanistan...... in a helicopter.... firing a machine gun at them...' thats Democracy there ... '  K

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Khriss said:

seems We are ruled over by the same old nonsense ,  I love the remark by scots comic' oh yea, Prince Harry , flying over Afghanistan...... in a helicopter.... firing a machine gun at them...' thats Democracy there ... '  K

Well, at least they were allowed to shoot back  .  .  .

P.S.

The "get yer knob out with the lads an give it a tug, or two"

Pure Public School stuff, from a couple of blokes I met in the OTC.

 

Edited by difflock
  • Like 1
Posted
seems We are ruled over by the same old nonsense ,  I love the remark by scots comic' oh yea, Prince Harry , flying over Afghanistan...... in a helicopter.... firing a machine gun at them...' thats Democracy there ... '  K


Says the Scots comic from behind the relative safety of a microphone in a Glasgow nightclub.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, TIMON said:

 


Says the Scots comic from behind the relative safety of a microphone in a Glasgow nightclub.
 

 

'Relative safety of '  Glasgow or Afghanistan ?? I wouldn't  take my chances either way there mate ?  K

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
Yup "safety in a Glasgow nightclub" sounds like as big an oxymoron as "Military Intelligence" or "fighting for peace"


I was anticipating this..... s’why I said ‘relative safety.’ Flying a helicopter over a combat zone in Afghanistan must rank in a different league than wading through bitten off Glaswegians’ ears.
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, TIMON said:

 


I was anticipating this..... s’why I said ‘relative safety.’ Flying a helicopter over a combat zone in Afghanistan must rank in a different league than wading through bitten off Glaswegians’ ears.

 

What!, have the modern Glasgie snowflakes started spitting the bitten off ears out?

eh lad, in my day they fucking chewed down an ate them wi relish.

Pussies.

  • Like 1
Posted

In fact i would never venture North of Carlisle without a 50 calibre on the Series, tho the scran is better than Afghanistan  ( Scotch pies !!! ?)   k

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Boris is going on about his bridge idea again (not the garden one that cost £53m to not build another more ambitious one)

 

Might need some skyhooks for it.....

 

WWW.BBC.CO.UK

Number 10 says "a range of government officials" are looking at the idea of a linking bridge.

 

So probably cost a few billion for the experts to decide its not a good idea ?

 

20 bn a bargin though compared to HS2?

 

 

 

 

Edited by Stere
  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.