Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Government Figures


Billhook
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here we have yet another “Follow the Science”

So the pollution from wood burning is only half what it was last year.  This follows all the government models for many things including Covid deaths and Climate Change forecasts

Sure it should always be “ Question the Science” with automatically being called a denier.  Question the science and expect a calmly reasoned response

5627CB1A-C5D1-491F-A788-CC7BF993B82E.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

40 minutes ago, Billhook said:

Here we have yet another “Follow the Science”

So the pollution from wood burning is only half what it was last year.  This follows all the government models for many things including Covid deaths and Climate Change forecasts

Sure it should always be “ Question the Science” with automatically being called a denier.  Question the science and expect a calmly reasoned response

5627CB1A-C5D1-491F-A788-CC7BF993B82E.jpeg

I wonder what the source and date was?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Billhook said:

Here we have yet another “Follow the Science”

So the pollution from wood burning is only half what it was last year.  This follows all the government models for many things including Covid deaths and Climate Change forecasts

Sure it should always be “ Question the Science” with automatically being called a denier.  Question the science and expect a calmly reasoned response

5627CB1A-C5D1-491F-A788-CC7BF993B82E.jpeg

 

43 minutes ago, Billhook said:

Here we have yet another “Follow the Science”

So the pollution from wood burning is only half what it was last year.  This follows all the government models for many things including Covid deaths and Climate Change forecasts

Sure it should always be “ Question the Science” with automatically being called a denier.  Question A bit more on the subject here which is interesting in view of 

1A104B4C-4C9A-45D4-BDD5-B8901E17D7AA.jpeg

Edited by Billhook
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reports can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/emissions-of-air-pollutants/emissions-of-air-pollutants-in-the-uk-particulate-matter-pm10-and-pm25

 

Looking through the reports, data and various links I'm not sure how acurate the numbers are. Some of the numbers seem to be based on what they describe as "highly uncertain estimates".

 

I did find this document which seems to try and work out the various sources of particulates but it seems to be based on multiple statistics and surveys so the room for error is huge.

 

From here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1054220/Methods_and_quality_processes_for_UK_air_pollutant_emissions_statistics.pdf

 

Quote

For all sources, the activity data are not routinely collected as annual statistics across the timeseries. Instead, the NAEI generates the timeseries estimates of activity based on available survey data and published statistics, together with proxy data to extrapolate across years where data are missing. The activity estimates were refined in 2011 and 2012 in the light of a national waste burning habits survey of a thousand UK households completed on behalf of Defra in 2010, and with improved representation of numbers of households and allotments across the timeseries.

The above is just part of their explanation of how they worked out the numbers for bonfires. Based on an old survey and I'm sure many of the responses to that would have been rather innacurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, donnk said:

meanwhile china has 1110 coal fired power stations. 

 


China has the greatest number of coal-fired power stations of any country or territory in the world.

 

How else are they expected to power the factories to make all of the kit to satisfy our green energy goals ? 🙄

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a stitch up.

 

Come up with some stats that say we have a major problem so let's have lots of legislation to deal with the problem. Bring in the legislation and then admit the stats that were founded on false info. Bet the legislation and this bureaucracy wont disappear.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.