Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, SbTVF said:

 

The issue with the UK system though is that it was only intended to replace the use of fossil fuels so they shouldn’t have allowed log drying as a suitable use where it wasn’t already being undertaken by fossil fuels which the vast majority of kin dryers now definitely weren’t doing back then.

 

They’ve literally created an industry financed by RHI through their shoddy legislation and shitty implementation of it as per usual.

 

We kiln dry but the boiler was entirely financed by the farm and farm house. The log kiln is on the system but only uses maybe 15% of the output and it would still be cheaper to use (if they made us take it off the heat calculation) than putting up a great big shed on field space that we can’t afford to give up anyway.

 

When we applied, all they asked for pretty much was that we were a business that had been operating for the last 10 years or something. Didn’t check that the log kiln was existing and being fired off gas.

 

Then again, ofgem wouldn’t have hit their implementation targets if they’d said no to all those installations would they ?‍♂️

That's why we started, it was either massively increase storage space and still struggle to dry below 20% or adapt a shed into a kiln. It cost a fair bit in insulation and piping but luckily RHI will pay off the boiler installation as opposed to going for oil or diesel. 

 

The strange thing is that they're encouraging kiln drying with legislation on dry logs but they've also removed RHI on log drying. As usual it's knee jerk reactions rather than a long term plan. 

  • Like 1

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
22 minutes ago, gdh said:

That's why we started, it was either massively increase storage space and still struggle to dry below 20% or adapt a shed into a kiln. It cost a fair bit in insulation and piping but luckily RHI will pay off the boiler installation as opposed to going for oil or diesel. 

 

The strange thing is that they're encouraging kiln drying with legislation on dry logs but they've also removed RHI on log drying. As usual it's knee jerk reactions rather than a long term plan. 

Has the RHI gone completely now on new installations now do you know G ?

Posted
5 hours ago, arboriculturist said:

Has the RHI gone completely now on new installations now do you know G ?

Yes, as far as I know it's gone apart from the last few that already applied who are allowed to complete. 

 

I'm not sure if there's still a grey area on replacing an existing installation. 

Posted
On 15/11/2018 at 20:51, brynseiri said:

I'm of the opinion that all of these biomass schemes are a great big white elephant, a few people are fortunate enough to have drying kilns etc built and grant aid assigned to them to be paid for burning wood chip, so the more chip you burn, the more taxpayers £'s you earn. That is their good luck, and hats off to them for their business acumen. Where am I going with this? Basically, these operations will be those that kiln dry logs, so proposed regulations as regards to log moisture limits will undoubtedly give rise to their income, and then the price of firewood. Will firewood remain a cheaper and sustainable alternative to coal after all of this? I'm fortunate, brought up on a small farm with a fair few acres of woodland, and 4 generations of us have managed woods and hedgerows, and fuelled the hearth fire with air dried logs. Now I've come to the conclusion that even making my own logs isn't financially viable. It's a time consuming task that requires more money spent than you'd first think. Saw chains, oil, fuel, labour, time away from earning a living. then they need to be stored for two years. I might as well buy coal and not wear out my chainsaw and not clock hours on my tractor, and do a few shifts overtime in my job. It just doesn't add up to me, burn more wood to produce wood to burn. in the days when wood was a primary fuel, my grandfather would have had an advantage over other farmers, his household heating costs would have been unnoticeable. However in the 21st century where the place no longer can sustain a family on its own, making firewood to me is a pain, it's just too expensive. Crazy, but true.

Same as you here in having several acres of woodland on the farm which needs managing.  Just the clearing up of wind blown stuff and diseased trees is enough to keep the home fires burning

I enjoy processing firewood now I have the Teleporter and processor and one ton boxes to air dry the split timber

I never sell any firewood, use it all here but the woods would soon turn into a real mess if I did not do this work

 

For those that do and wish to avoid being fined, just set yourself up as a supplier of David Hockney inspired garden art in the form of a folly

Contemplating a beautiful pile of logs on your patio is both calming and soothing and also helps meditation combined with a glass of good malt!

At Hockney prices you could sell a pile for millions!

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Will be interesting to see if they try and regulate for people selling wet wood for logs (unprocessed) rather than logs.  I suspect that there are quite a lot of people who process their own logs out there from arb waste (I'm one of them and I know of several others where I work that do it).  In my eyes arb waste is not fire wood/logs until processed so I'd hope that this new regulation would cover only the sale of processed logs.

 

I've only been doing this for about 3 years now but I'm using local arb waste that is dropped off as my contact is passing on his way home, processing by hand and air drying so almost no carbon footprint to produce it and I now use less gas to heat the house so it is reducing the amount of CO2 produced to heat the house.  In the process it also reduces the heating bill and I get some exercise and satisfaction from swinging an axe.  Also learnt a lot about how to/not to sharpen my chainsaw last year :) 

  • Like 2
Posted

How can anyone regulate on "wood for logs"? It would be impossible, as it would depend on a number of changing variables.

The only significant time that the moisture content really counts is the point of putting the log on the fire. What happens before that is of no significance.

  • Like 4
Posted
6 hours ago, DocMustard said:

How can anyone regulate on "wood for logs"? It would be impossible, as it would depend on a number of changing variables.

The only significant time that the moisture content really counts is the point of putting the log on the fire. What happens before that is of no significance.

Absofuckinglutely .

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.