Big J
-
Posts
9,232 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
46
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Classifieds
Tip Site Directory
Blogs
Articles
News
Arborist Reviews
Arbtalk Knot Guide
Gallery
Store
Calendar
Freelancers directory
Everything posted by Big J
-
My experience of the Alstors is that they are a great concept but that they are fragile. I've seen a stray bit of brash bend the lemon joint on the prop shaft, I've seen a weld fail on the outriggers when really it shouldn't. I don't dispute that they are good, productive machines. I however would not want to run one myself as there just isn't enough steel in them for my liking and they are very, very expensive, when you consider what you actually get. I am looking forward to seeing the Kinetic in May/June. I am also in Sweden in summer, and I shall pop over to see the Kranman facility. They might be crap, time will tell, but for me Alstor are a bit like Woodmizer. Great and indeed pioneering concept, but perhaps bettered by their competition?
-
They look great but they are too expensive new. What is the price of a reasonably specced 833? Edit: 58,000 euros start price, which is about 20,000 euros more than the Kinectic and more than a fully specced Kranman Bison 10000.
-
That sounds like the D's B's. The one we use has the capacity to take 18 tonnes back at the end of the day, making it quite a bit more useful that a normal crane.
-
Not good. I don't know what the reach required was, but I quite frequently use very heavy HIAB artics, which at £58 an hour plus the ability to transport the timber away from site is quite handly. 3.5 tonnes at 16m covers quite a few jobs as well.
-
What about a Mercedes Vario? Always fancied one myself and they also come in 4 wheel drive: MERCEDES 814 VARIO 4X4 CREW CAB CHASSIS CAB EX ELECTRICITY BOARD.. YEAR 2002 | eBay
-
I had one for over two years. Survived the first 19 months of my daughters existence as a chew toy/throwing toy. Excellent phone but retired for a tough smart phone (Kyocera KC-S701 - very good actually. Crap battery life compared the Aldi phone, but as someone who was smart phone phobic, it's converted me).
-
That tree has presumably been standing there for 400-500 years, without any major issues (I presume) with kids eating berries. Such a bloody shame. The yew has lovely form and seems to be in the prime of life.
-
I think that I possibly have an out and out winner for category of worst overloading of anything ever.... Chatting to an Irish contractor working on the dualling of the A9 at Kincraig at the pub the other night, he said he'd taken the Mitsubishi L200 and Ifor trailer up to the scrappies in Inverness with some shuttering. Towed it the whole 38 miles there and turns out he had 8 tonnes of steel on the trailer (tri axle). The way he chatted about it, it didn't even seem much like it was much out of the ordinary! I've no idea how he got up the Slochd towing that weight!
-
Good on you for trying to change their minds but this has to go down as one of the worst reasons I've ever heard for removing what has to be an historic tree of some significance.
-
We've recently done a 80% clearfell on elm (the remaining 20% was ash/maple/sycamore) and it's impossible not to leave some brash around stacks. Elm brash is awful to manually handle and even fairly small product lengths are stupidly heavy. As such, it's quicker to try to be intelligent about your felling (ie bunch your crowns into one pile) and not worry too much about removing every last piece of brash from stacks. We've found this to be quicker. Great video of the Kinetic - some lump of timber he loaded too
-
No, but I am aware that it should be being demonstrated in the UK May/June, and I'll make an effort to go and see it.
-
True. A bit of stacking by the cutters helps a lot, as well as there being minimal brash over the stacks. Looking forward to seeing the Kinetic 8x8 demonstrator
-
I understand the appeal of an alpine tractor, but it's not suitable for what we want to do. Too clumsy and compromised. The difficulty with a multi purpose machine is that it's never as good as something specialised. A small forwarder would be a lot quicker at forwarding small timber than an alpine tractor. There is enough work doing that, and even if there wasn't, we're not that bothered as there is plenty of other work at the mill
-
Awful that it is being felled. To echo Adam M - what is the reason for felling? I might have a contact in Lincolnshire who would be interested. I can check.
-
Sound like a lovely stem and ideal for a Lucas mill.
-
As in haulage costs to get the machine to site. With a mini forwarder, if I have a job that is 2 days (say 80-100 tonne on an easy site, 60-80 if not so easy) and it's 30 miles away, the haulage costs of getting a larger machine to site would make the job unfeasible whereas with a smaller machine, you just load it to your plant trailer and do the job with no additional costs. There are a lot of these smaller woodlands around, often with some good trees and these are the woodlands that the SRDP grants are aimed at.
-
Thing is that there are plenty of people with that size of machine - the market is quite competitive. You can't do small stands economically due to haulage costs, it's 6 times the weight empty and I doubt that grant funding would be available for that class of machine. I'm not disputing that they are very good machines, and I work with an 890 quite often, so I know both ends of the scale. Small scale forestry is just something I enjoy and I believe that these mini forwarders are the best way to do it.
-
It's certainly something I'd consider, and something I already do. I do quite a lot of elm harvesting (about 1500 tonnes of mostly elm in the past year) and always feel like a bit of a spare part on site without a machine to operate. I'm entirely capable of doing the felling, but other people do it better than me. There are a lot of local estate woodlands with medium sized hardwood where it's going to be mostly a firewood job, but with perhaps 25% by tonnage sawing butts. As it is at the moment on the estate where we live, the woodlands are getting hammered by oversized machinery and seemingly inept cutters. Just does my head in! A forwarder with a lift capacity of a little over a tonne would see most stems extracted in usable lengths without making a mess.
-
Right, had a 20 minute phone call with a forester friend, and he explained in detail the issues relating to first thinnings and spruce in this country (my background is primarily hardwoods). In short, hairy bastard spruce, grown too quickly, thinned too late and wolves that require substantial machinery. So, I'll shelve the harvester/processor idea for a moment, but the forwarder is still a goer. Does anyone have any other suggestions for road towable (as in sub 2.5 tonne unladen weight) forwarders other than Alstor, Kranman and Kinetic?
-
Certainly a nice machine, but the fact that it can't be towed to site on a normal 3.5t class trailer precludes it from consideration. Grant funding is principally aimed at small scale forestry and I don't think I'd get funding for that. I've always steered clear of grants thus far, but I figure 40% of the purchase cost is worth the effort.
-
It's £16,500, but extra £4k for diesel and an extra £800 for larger wheels.
-
That certainly looks quicker than their previous stroke processor. Skilled operator though - looks like a learning curve on the hydraulics. Any idea what sort of money that is? Does that make more sense than a roller processor?
-
All outstanding feedback and very much appreciated. I've always felt that the most important stage of the management of a stand is the early stage. Get the first thinning right and the rest is relatively simple. That being said, I'm not willing to lose money on it! So it looks like a little forwarder is perhaps not a bad idea but the harvester is not. I will have a look at the Kinetic in May when it's in the UK and I'll pop over to the Kranman factory when I'm in Sweden in summer (only a couple of hours from where my brother in law lives). J
-
The newer version does have a full cab. The marketing idea would be to get into stands before they got to 40cm. For first thinning, it's way too late and from what I'm lead to believe, means an increased risk of windblow.
-
The hairiness of the stems is going to be the determining factor I guess. Something I'd need to speak to the manufacturer about. The hydraulic flow rate seems to be quite high on the Usewood machine. Even if you managed the low end of that scale (30 cube a shift), that's still a wagon load and still makes sense financially.
