Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
49 minutes ago, daveatdave said:

don't forget they had to have a negative test before they were allowed in to these events so its not surprising 

I’ll take any tiny bit of positivity in the midst of this lunacy 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Mark J said:

One down...

Saw the phrase "A fish rots from the head down"

 

Hanckcock is just a symptom of a deeper problem 

Edited by Woodworks
  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Mesterh said:

He should have been sacked and not allowed to resign,  the two faced babe.

 


He said Neil Ferguson's rule breach had left him speechless.

 

Ferguson is back in like nothing ever happened, slap on the wrist a short break and slide back in on the payroll,  it doesn’t matter who’s in charge it’s much of a muchness, how many times was old Mandleson given the push 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Edited by Johnsond
  • Like 3
Posted
56 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Ferguson is back in like nothing ever happened, slap on the wrist a short break and slide back in on the payroll,  it doesn’t matter who’s in charge it’s much of a muchness, how many times was old Mandleson given the push 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

Never mind all that shit . Quins win the Gallager premiership final . FFS !

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
Saw the phrase "A fish rots from the head down"
 
Hanckcock is just a symptom of a deeper problem 
Not heard that before, quite a vivid phrase. Rather apt for the group of people in question here. Hancock resigning is obviously months and months overdue, but it's pertinent that he didn't actually get the sack by Boris. I heard someone speculating today that he refuses to sack any one of the number of failures around him because they are useful scapegoats for him. Probably a grain or more of truth in that.

I can't help thinking that we'd be in a much better position now if Hancock had gone last year instead of Prof Neil Ferguson. The number of fckups with his name on is shameful, (Hancock). The guy is a liability.

Just the rest of the fish to go now.
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.