Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Making the news today....


Mick Dempsey

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

I don't doubt that lockdown would've been a negative influence for some kids but I'd think that for others it could be a positive. There are a lot of individuals that don't derive great mental health from 'normal' childhood life, and being away from school, socialising and other pressures of living in society might have been a happier time. They could have struggled just as much with lockdown ending, but the headlines wouldn't focus on that.

 

Personally, I thought much of the restrictions imposed did go too far, but lockdown itself was not a negative experience for me as an individual.

 

In the longer term I suspect some kids will have issues because of it but the majority will learn from the experience at an emotional level and may gain some resilience. I can't think of a generational event before that caused ongoing, widespread mental health problems for kids that experienced it. A lot of kids had WW2 in their childhood and it didn't lead to a generation of fuddled adults.

 

Social media and junk food too, like most things in life have good and bad points, depends what you take from them. I wonder how many young girls will be unhappy in their bedroom this weekend due to their use of social media, and how many will be excited and dreaming for the future following The Lionesses on social media instead.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, sime42 said:

It could be argued that in the long-term, Social Media and Junk Food are far more damaging to children's mental and physical health. Discuss.
I think France at least is making progress on both fronts.

I could 42 adopt the tactics you hide behind and post up a dumb arse pic that in no way detracts from the fact you are firmly in the category mentioned by another member earlier, anyway the big difference between the two issues you describe, as valid as they may be and the state enforced lunacy you supported is that I can in some respects control what my children eat and indeed can also if required monitor or restrict internet/social media access. I could not reopen schools, allow mask free learning, allow limited/unlimited travel or visitation of family or friends, enable access to dental and other non essential but still important health care etc etc etc . What I could  and did do is stop the vaccination of my kids with a totally unnecessary and unproven vaccine despite a great deal of pressure from NHS Scotland and their school. 
Id like to know how many of the original covid warriors on here, knowing what they know now are  still taking the vaccinations offered themselves , still happy to allow their children to be vaccinated regularly. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, eggsarascal said:

I don’t know trig, we could bang on about it forever, it still isn’t going to change what happened.

The more people bang on about it, the more people realize we where all lied to and all conned into accepting the BS the more is will stay in out collective consciousness and the less likely we are to allow it to happen again. Hence why I added that quote regarding those that forget the past are destined to repeat it. 

 

Im not sure why you think other people are of the opinion that banging on about it will change whats happened though? I have yet to see any evidence for your line of reasoning, literally no one is suggesting what you seem to believe. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Johnsond said:

I could 42 adopt the tactics you hide behind and post up a dumb arse pic that in no way detracts from the fact you are firmly in the category mentioned by another member earlier, anyway the big difference between the two issues you describe, as valid as they may be and the state enforced lunacy you supported is that I can in some respects control what my children eat and indeed can also if required monitor or restrict internet/social media access. I could not reopen schools, allow mask free learning, allow limited/unlimited travel or visitation of family or friends, enable access to dental and other non essential but still important health care etc etc etc . What I could  and did do is stop the vaccination of my kids with a totally unnecessary and unproven vaccine despite a great deal of pressure from NHS Scotland and their school. 
Id like to know how many of the original covid warriors on here, knowing what they know now are  still taking the vaccinations offered themselves , still happy to allow their children to be vaccinated regularly. 

 

Not hiding behind anything Nd, I just can't be bothered trying to have a calm, reasoned
discussion with you, it's not possible. Besides, there's nowt wrong with a bit of humour to lighten the mood sometimes.

 

Lockdowns, (and other associated mitigation measures), were a necessary evil. Hugely damaging obviously, but necessary in the circumstances nonetheless. I'm pretty sure that I'm not alone in that viewpoint, but if I am then so be it. Incidentally, had we had an honest and competent government at the time then some of the negative consequences could have been significantly lessened. Also, there were some positive aspects that you tend to overlook.

 

At the end of the day it's in the past, you can't change anything. Doesn't matter how much you rant and whine about it on here. There's a host of far more important issues that urgently need addressing. This topic wastes far too much bandwidth.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mesterh said:

This should be a good enough reason to bring back hanging.

 

WWW.GOOGLE.COM

The 33-year-old has been convicted of murdering babies while working at the Countess...

 

I hope that they are going to go after the management who turned a blind eye to it all. 

I think they are already going after the management, as they should. It sounds like there were some serious fckups there, compounding the hideous crimes she was committing.

 

As in other nasty cases like this, I feel for the poor buggers who had to sit on the jury. I had to do it once, but thankfully it was a straightforward case of one scally youth attacking another scally youth.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.