Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Solid flywheel for TD5 opinions please...


Billy
 Share

Recommended Posts

So the clutch and possibly dual mass flywheel are on the way out on my recently purchased defender, I've preen looking into solid flywheels and DMFs, general consensus on the landy forums seems to be that if you are working them hard a solid flywheels the way forward but it makes the vehicle louder and increases vibrations which doesn't seem great...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

I was going to fit one to a 3 litre Iveco Daily and was told not to as it could lead to a damaged crank shaft - apparently the DMF provides cushioning to the crank shaft as well as smoothing the drive take up. This issue was apparently specific to my particular engine however. I know a few people who have successfully fitted solid flywheels to transits and Navaras with no ill consequences. If I were you I'd go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not a good idea , you will get more vibration and there is a certain drone the occurs that i found unbearable , i discussed this at length with the fitter at western power and they agreed that it was a foolish idea to go to a solid flywheel , they did a few but found in the long run there were further problems . they now only do this conversion to mwb-lwb tansits !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From my experience of transits and what of heard from owners of newer Landies,

dual mass flywheels were introduced because the technology is there rather than the need for them.

When my transit DM flywheel blew up after 55k miles I was advised by all Ford experts to fit a single mass flywheel. I did and it is just as good (just my opinion).

If dual mass is so good why do so many people offer single mass upgrades?

 

They are th McCulloch of the transmission world

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seem to be arguments for and against, but with no clear overwhelming case one way or the other.

 

It is interesting to bear in mind that when LR fitted the transit-derived Puma engine into Defender they reverted from the DMF (Transit) to solid flywheel and sprung clutch (Puma), this must have been for a reason.

 

OK, so they messed it up and the early clutches were rubbish, but there is no doubt at all that the clutch and gearbox on my Puma Defender is infinitely nicer to operate than the clutch and gearbox on my TD5 Disco 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

replace a dmf with a solid on td5 defender approx 18months ago.

van is worked V hard towing and carrying every day

no noticeable difference in actual performance except an annoying rattle from the clutch release bearing (I think) - ie rattles when sat in traffic at a stop in neutral without the clutch depressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.