Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

WOW


Kylus Sylvestris
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, renewablejohn said:

Think you will find when the full story comes out there is a very good reason.

There'll undoubtedly be a reason, but it won't be a good one. There is no justification for this.

 

I also think that the public backlash will make life very difficult for the perpetrators to the extent that they'll probably come to regret it. Joe Public will probably end end paying for their protection.

 

I wonder if the movie is planned yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

4 hours ago, doobin said:

???

 

you’re going to have to explain a bit more. 
 

are you saying the tenant had timber rights and felled this before his tenancy lapsed to spite the landlord for not renewing the lease? If the tree wasn’t officially protected then this might actually be legal!

As I said I am not going to speculate but looking through the normal landlord tenant agreement I came to the same conclusion as you regarding whether it was legal or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Steven P said:

 

Not sure how this goes with a tree that was there well before the tenancy started, probably had very little care or input from the tenant. Might be different if for example the tenant had planted an orchard. However I don't think that this counts as coppicing either

Who would put money on this sycamore not growing back if fenced off so the public/wildlife cannot damage it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, renewablejohn said:

Who would put money on this sycamore not growing back if fenced off so the public/wildlife cannot damage it.

Given its age and the exposed location I think its chances are fairly slim. Had it been a younger tree, in a more favourable position, you would have struggled to stop it coppicing.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Slicer Dicer said:
WWW.HEXHAM-COURANT.CO.UK

A FARMING family has claimed that a dog walker left one of their sheep for dead after a vicious attack by...

 

 

I can see that such a popular spot could have been cause for contention. This kind of thing going on and other such things not that it excuses doing this 😡 That's the son- clearly not a 16 yr old. The father could be in his 60s though. All speculation of course. Was the tree actually protected? Got a feeling whoever did perhaps knew it wasn't..?

That article is 3 years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Honda said:

That article is 3 years old.

Yes I know, I wasn't suggesting that the article was the reason specifically but just highlighting that they've obviously had issues in the past as most farmers will have when the public come on to their land en masse. Personally I'd doubt it was the farmer tbh- they're generally pretty in touch with local sentiment and the vulnerability of upsetting the apple cart so to speak.

 

Long time generational farming family.  Even if there tenancy had been terminated prior to this for whatever reason- they'd have to be pretty idiotic to do something like this and expect to be successful taking on another tenancy elsewhere.

Edited by Slicer Dicer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Slicer Dicer said:

Yes I know, I wasn't suggesting that the article was the reason specifically but just highlighting that they've obviously had issues in the past as most farmers will have when the public come on to their land en masse. Personally I'd doubt it was the farmer tbh- they're generally pretty in touch with local sentiment and the vulnerability of upsetting the apple cart so to speak.

 

Long time generational farming family.  Even if there tenancy had been terminated prior to this for whatever reason- they'd have to be pretty idiotic to do something like this and expect to be successful taking on another tenancy elsewhere.

It’s actually very hard bordering upon impossible for a landlord to terminate a three generation farming tenancy from the 70s. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, skyhuck said:

Given its age and the exposed location I think its chances are fairly slim. Had it been a younger tree, in a more favourable position, you would have struggled to stop it coppicing.

 

I think they meant- whoever chopped the fu€ker down, will also make an effort to prevent it surviving. I think if fenced off and not attacked by humans, it would grow back successfully.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.