Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Not technically, they don't need to be tagged.

 

They're treated more like horses, so you don't even need a CPH

Edited by GarethM
  • Like 1

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
4 minutes ago, Zaman said:

Can I ask... if sheep are so much work and time consuming and headache to have... then why does everyone have them? 

If someone grows potatoes in a veg garden and sells them they'll make bugger all. If they do the same with 50 acres they'll make a few quid. 

  • Like 2
Posted

To breed and grow lamb can be profitable, however you need a few hundred to be earn a basic living, at this point a few losses are excepted but if you have 10 it’s almost as much work as a 100 and you lose a higher percentage so not viable. The tipping point seems to be about 50 to make the effort vs reward viable on a commercial level but that is as part of a mixed set up

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Zaman said:

Can I ask... if sheep are so much work and time consuming and headache to have... then why does everyone have them? 

Might be a can of worms mentioning this, but subsidies. Most of the meat must be going abroad, talking to people I know about this recently, they (me included) don't eat lamb or mutton on a regular basis. But the hills and fields are full of sheep.

Kinda seems like we are subsidising a supply of meat to Europe?

Posted
6 minutes ago, scbk said:

Might be a can of worms mentioning this, but subsidies. Most of the meat must be going abroad, talking to people I know about this recently, they (me included) don't eat lamb or mutton on a regular basis. But the hills and fields are full of sheep.

Kinda seems like we are subsidising a supply of meat to Europe?

I eat lamb fairly regularly. I used to buy a box of hogget from a farmer up north but he stopped doing runs down my way as he was selling out locally. 

Posted

Subsidies, not really worth the paperwork or agro. In generalist terms you'd need to be a hill farmer owning Snowdonia or a big boy arable farmer.

 

Most of us fall in the middle and to be honest isn't worth having you're hands tied behind your back with yet more rules.

 

If I had 100acres it might be feasible, but the stewardship stuff gets in way, unless the newer schemes make it more about common sense environmental stuff we already try to achieve and does zero to reduce costs of production.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.