VW AMAROK !!!! Thoughts

[Dbikeguy]

I found it felt quite small inside when i drove once small windows maybe? Went well and was comfy.
Bought a Hilux though

[Stihllymok]

33 minutes ago, Stihl123 said:

ranger is cheaper and has better tech

a 'mate' spent 15k more on an amarok than my ranger and i have more tech than his does

 

stihl vs husky subject this

You don't have any Mates.

[spuddog0507]

If your buying a truck for work purpose,s does it really matter about the fuel if the said truck does the job its all tax deductable  there will be plenty of people on here including myself who have made bad decisions when buying a truck/van to be used for work, and it all boiled down to a few MPG, worst one i ever did was buy a Leyland DAF 200 petrol it was so expensive to run i only had it 6 wk then bought what i originally wanted a Peugeot 305 1,9 diesel van and they where worlds apart, kept that for 9 year,

 

[Big J]

Bah. Amaroks are little baby cars for little babies. 

 

The Touareg V10 is where it's at 😎

[miker]

1 hour ago, Big J said:

Bah. Amaroks are little baby cars for little babies. 

 

The Touareg V10 is where it's at 😎

yes, but you are about 10 feet tall lol, im a only 5 foot 10 soaking wet lol

[MattyF]

Crap off road, maybe better with decent tyres though , alright for towing stuff.

[Mick Dempsey]

I don’t think they look that good if I’m honest.

[Rac man]

17 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

I don’t think they look that good if I’m honest.

Buy a ford ranger 3.2 t6  much nicer to drive

 

[Jwarwick]

I have the V6 aventura 254 bhp fast motor for a pick up I think there a great tool I’ve been in a 3.2 ranger and put the Amarok way ahead but that’s my opinion. They are thirsty but it doesn’t worry me.

[PeteB]

I've had my Ranger down to 15mpg on a tank and up to 28. They are a tool and the costs need pricing into the job. You get good ones and bad in all of them. Makes your choice and pays your money. I like VW stuff but I did think that they were a chunk of money!