Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Richard 1234 said:

I think that’s the point it’s the Chinese government not it’s people that’s the problem.

I think its both the people and the government. The People, at least a portion of them, and the government for allowing them to live like that. Yes the government rules them with an Iron Fist, but does that have to make what appears to be a sizable portion of the population so completely lacking in compassion for life? Be it animals or human? There are other poor countries in the world yet the do not seem to be anywhere near as cruel. 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Currently doing an Ash clearfell site, no contact with anyone really, cancelled all domestic work.. had a customer who really wanted us in next week, but turned him down, doesn’t feel morally right and also not the professional image I want to portray..

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, tree-fancier123 said:

Well I can understand your objections to China, but you can't dismiss everything they've contributed to the modern world. I don't know the details but I expect many of them have made important contributions to medicine ( eating bats n killing sharks) , science ( didnt put a man on the moon )  maths  ( nope thats the Arabs)  even porn ( ......... Errrrrrr  dunno there ?

They did fight the Japanese fr a bit.  An those cheap chainsaws n tools aint to be sneezed at.  K

Edited by Khriss
Sorry sorry ?
Posted
11 hours ago, Mr. Squirrel said:

I'm not contesting the countries track record. I used to live and work there so I'm far, far from ignorant to the ways in which the country works. I don't need to hear them from you.

But tarring an entire nations people with the same brush 'filthy Chinese' is unacceptable and disgusting language.

 

I know this is taking the thread off topic a bit and I apologise to the bystanders, but I just don't think it's ok to stand aside and turn a blind eye to this kind of thing.

I promised myself I wouldn’t react any more of your post on this subject but reading the news this morning it looks like China is going to face dyer consequences over the outbreak and there handleing of the Coronavirus and world leaders getting together to decide how to carry it out and has warned China it could come a pariah state.

i may not be a politician but if they are echoing what I said yesterday we’ll just maybe I was wright and you were wrong to defend them.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, carlos said:

what about the ten thousand dead in italy alone!!!??? is that all down to the way the filthy Italians live!

i think the blame game is a road to nowhere and face the fact this virus is calling the shots the world over.

self preservation , social distancing, isolation and care for the vunerable is the way forward not racist generalizations imo.

carl

Well, certainly didn't wash their hands enufff! 

 

Actually as its an Airborne  respiratory illness tha volume of anti bacteria mouthwash still  on shelves speaks volumes abt our perceptions. (  i started on it soon as) 

 

But its a lovely sunny sunday here so will go to shed n get the pitchforks and flaming brands out....... K

  • Like 1
Posted
On 25/03/2020 at 19:04, the village idiot said:

There was boffin on radio 4 today saying that the govt needs to be careful how many people in the population they stop from working.

 

There is a very real risk that in an overly severe economic shutdown scenario we will see more lives lost as a result of the shut down than are saved by protecting people from the virus.

 

It's a complicated old situation.

Did you listen on to Majeed on wireless yesterday?

 

Prof of Risk Management presented a case that at or beyond a 6% reduction in GDP, the adverse impact on life expectancy would would present a worse outcome than C19 predicted fatality impact. 
 

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Did you listen on to Majeed on wireless yesterday?

 

Prof of Risk Management presented a case that at or beyond a 6% reduction in GDP, the adverse impact on life expectancy would would present a worse outcome than C19 predicted fatality impact. 
 

No I didn't listen on, but I have heard others making the same point.

 

It highlighted for me the fact that there are precious few straightforward decisions in life, especially decisions involving millions or billions of people.

 

Everything is complicated, and anyone floating simple 'one size fits all' solutions to a country's issues should be subject to scrutiny.

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.