Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Vespasian said:

Your sister plainly hasn't the strength to keep the dog under control, the other dog is of no consequence..   her dog should of been restrained from biting the other dog, whether she likes to hear that or not..   thats the problem.   

 

she needs to reconsider having greyhounds, these dogs are extremely dangerous and shouldn't be considered as pets in my opinion..   especially for someone getting on in yrs..  

 

I'm not debating the merits of paying off a fine or compensation.. thats a different matter altogether..   but I'll chime in if you insist...

 

The point here is only keep a dog you have the strength to control..  whether your fifteen or goin on seventy...

The other dog is of great consequence . If it was not there it would not have happened . 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
1 minute ago, eggsarascal said:

I'm confused! Is this Stubby's sister or sister-in-law. Either way I guess Vesp ain't got a clue what he's talking about again.

Oh but I do, I've made some good points and no one has pointed out any faults with my argument..

Posted
Just now, Vespasian said:

Oh but I do, I've made some good points and no one has pointed out any faults with my argument..

Why do you presume my sis in law is " getting on in years " ?

Posted
1 minute ago, Stubby said:

The other dog is of great consequence . If it was not there it would not have happened . 

And if your sister in law had the strength to control her dog she wouldn't be in the predicament she found herself in...

Posted
Just now, Vespasian said:

And if your sister in law had the strength to control her dog she wouldn't be in the predicament she found herself in...

You spout shit .

  • Like 1
Posted

TL: DR past page 1 

 

1. arrested under the dangous dog act, !

2. Keeping dog under proper control !

 

wtf.  The dog is not on the dangerous list  and was kept under proper control (a lead) 

how about the yapping dog owner gets charged failing to keep her dog under control. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Vespasian said:

 no one has pointed out any faults with my argument..

We have better things to do, "battle of wits, unarmed man" etc.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Stubby said:

Why do you presume my sis in law is " getting on in years " ?

GaryPrentice suggested she might be getting on, made it sound like she was hobbling around on a zimnmer frame so he did...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.