That's were it was left

[Khriss]

10 hours ago, Conor Wright said:

must be sumfink wrong with mine.. is the hole in the side of yours?!

Wouldn't call it vesp, its not limp and contains some actual substance of value.

Sorry vesp, its not that i'm jumping on a bandwagon here but i've read enough of your posts in my short while here to realise you're a bit of a wanker, thats all.

Bit late in the evening for such bile k

[Khriss]

1 hour ago, Steve Bullman said:

You can take an early festive break for that

Throw in Easter, an I will get you a malt. K

[trigger_andy]

10 hours ago, Conor Wright said:

Point proven. thank you. if i ever find a festering shitty buttplug hanging from a branch i shall name it after you. I shall name it "unloved angry narcissistic little man hiding behind a pseudonym who attempts to rile others up but in the end becomes the butt of the joke himself"

 

1 hour ago, Steve Bullman said:

You can take an early festive break for that

And what about this Rocket that posted the above in Bold? Is this language acceptable but what Vesp said much worse? Id beg to differ. Both are equally 'naughty' and if one is banned for a period then this Troll should be as well. This guy for no reason what-so-ever picked on Vesp and he in my opinion rightfully replied in the way he did. Yet this weirdo feels he was feeding the Troll? 

 

[billpierce]

And what about this Rocket that posted the above in Bold? Is this language acceptable but what Vesp said much worse? Id beg to differ. Both are equally 'naughty' and if one is banned for a period then this Troll should be as well. This guy for no reason what-so-ever picked on Vesp and he in my opinion rightfully replied in the way he did. Yet this weirdo feels he was feeding the Troll? 
 

I suspect it's a more rounded long term view of his attitude and approach. Many people including me swear on here from time to time, some people however just seem to go out of their way to wind people up and generally trash literally every thread they're involved in. Really brings the forum down imo.

I tried just blocking posts from some users but doesnt seem to work on the app. Have got used to just swiping past them, but tbh would rather I didnt have to.


I guess there will always be debate over barring people, but i reckons this is a good thing and forum will be better off for it. Thank God matlock has self censored himself off somewhere else.

[Khriss]

....if I ever turn up on a tree job and there is a Festering shitty butt plug in said tree , I will be adjusting my rates I assure you. K

[trigger_andy]

11 minutes ago, billpierce said:

I suspect it's a more rounded long term view of his attitude and approach. Many people including me swear on here from time to time, some people however just seem to go out of their way to wind people up and generally trash literally every thread they're involved in. Really brings the forum down imo.

I tried just blocking posts from some users but doesnt seem to work on the app. Have got used to just swiping past them, but tbh would rather I didnt have to.


I guess there will always be debate over barring people, but i reckons this is a good thing and forum will be better off for it. Thank God matlock has self censored himself off somewhere else.

I understand what you're saying. But the Mod made it clear Vesp was getting banned for this particular outburst. I'll assume it was as others have mentioned due to his language yet this Troll replies in kind and nothing apparent has happened to him even when he was the instigator. His use of swear words and what he said was equally if not more disgusting. So for fairness and balance they should either both be banned or neither of them should. 

 

Personally I dont care for banning. Its childish and we're supposedly grown-ups here and maybe hear naughty words during our every day life...

[eggsarascal]

Steve's site, Steve's rules. Long and short of it.

[trigger_andy]

1 minute ago, eggsarascal said:

Steve's site, Steve's rules. Long and short of it.

Fair enough, if its just a personal dislike for the guy then he should have just said so. Might as well just ban him completely then as well? Why mask it as breaking forum rules? Why bother posting and enforcing forum rules when ''Steve's site, Steve's rules'' would be a much easier list to abide by. 

 

You really are a Walloper aren't you?  

[eggsarascal]

4 minutes ago, trigger_andy said:

Fair enough, if its just a personal dislike for the guy then he should have just said so. Might as well just ban him completely then as well? Why mask it as breaking forum rules? Why bother posting and enforcing forum rules when ''Steve's site, Steve's rules'' would be a much easier list to abide by. 

 

You really are a Walloper aren't you?  

Link me back to where forum rules were mentioned.

 

[trigger_andy]

1 minute ago, eggsarascal said:

Link me back to where forum rules were mentioned.

 

Dont be so facetious. The reason was apparent to me and to others who posted after Vesp's retaliation. Your asinine reasoning is apparent in almost every one of your posts.