Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert


donnk
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Yup, yer man Peterson, is so on the money.

So much of what he says is so evidently empirically true as to make it quite laughable that some i.e. mostly the feminists and gender benders can attempt to argue otherwise.

And yes, it is tough for women to raise family and have a career, let alone a mega career.

And, the key, for me, was his question,;

"do you mean equality of opportunity, or equality of outcome", because they are quite different things"

But the human animal evolved to succeed, at least in family raising, as a team, a man and a woman working together, each doing what they do best, which will vary with the individuals who choose to partner up with a compatible other.

And I believe we have lost a lot, as a result of social and geographical mobility, by thus inadvertently distancing ourselves from our parents, or critically, the grandparents of our children, who are actually better equipped, in disposable time, experience and patience, to nurture children right through adolescence, but only if sharing a common, or very nearby dwelling.

From someone who did not have grandparents "on tap".

cheers

Marcus

Edited by difflock
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peterson is definitely a very interesting chap, I find it impossible to fully work him out. 
 

I have watched loads of interviews with him over the last few months and although I agree with the majority of what he says there is some strange stuff lurking underneath. Sometimes he gets so incredibly intense I genuinely wonder if his is a borderline sociopath.

 

He is also a Christian, not necessarily anything wrong with that in his case as he doesn't seem to adhere to damaging dogma, but his faith does seem to underpin a certain amount of his thinking about issues, and he readily admits himself that he is confused about why he believes what he does.

 

I've also heard a couple of podcasts where he completely ties himself up in knots.

 

My personal jury is still out on Peterson.

 

Just putting it out there. No harm intended to anybody.

Edited by the village idiot
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/01/2018 at 19:35, difflock said:

Now how could we get Diane Abbot in a debate with Jason Perteson.

Well it would'nt really pass for a debate, and,

She is stupid, but I suspect not that stupid!

Still be highly entertaining though!

mth

It would be like having a game of chess with a pigeon, it wouldn’t know the rules, you could quite easily win, but it would still nock all the peices over shit on the board and fly off happy with itself.

Edited by Sheepy
  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.