OK gents, I was aware that would raise a few hackles.
Unfortunately the "out for a blast" wording, in the origional post I believe, did not perhaps help in my preception.
Plus the article in the local paper, all paint a particular picture in my mind.
Which is to say anyone I ever knew who fitted that description generally lived life a bit near the edge.
When I was learning to drive 35 years ago my father taught me to always assume/presume that the other driver is a twit and will NOT indicate.
Read the "car language" why are they slowing up, are they going to turn in etc.
Probably a bit like the advanced Police training course.
A perfect example.
Recently I came up behing a tractor with a plough on the back, 4 or 5 fur.
I was considering overtaking, when I realized
(i) he was slowing?
(ii) there was a farm place just ahead, on the left.
I therefore hung back a bit.
The car behind me choose to overtake both of us and was very nearly sideswiped off the road when the plough swung out as the tractor swung in.
As I knew it would, if he turned in, this was what I based my decision on.
If he had not turned in I would have another opportunity to pass safely.
PS
I am currently getting screw over by a stupid bitch, who on a clear road in the 250 straight metres from a roundabout she had just navigated.
struck our stationary vehicle in the outer lane.
I had my indicator on.
DID NOT SEE ME
wtF!
That would have been my first accident in 30 years.
My only other as a relatively new driver I was found not to be at fault.
I have driven considerable distances down the years incl quite a bit on the Continent.
PS
Eggs
Yoy slagged Mrs thatcher rotten when she died (if I recall correctly)
However, and again I can only presume, from the information presented that you gamble, this may be wrong, but otherwise a £500.00 is very odd.
Gamblers are generally telling about the winning bets than the loosing ones.
that is all
good luck.
Me?
I, were reared a dour presbyterian, an it akinda stuck.
cheers
Marcus