Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Looks like The governenment has caused a diplomatic row on the back of no evidence again: https://news.sky.com/story/putin-demands-inquiry-into-nerve-agent-attack-11315686

Jeremy Corbyn advocates "caution."

 

A broad raft of other independent national governments and organisations implement direct action....

 

Which do you think might have seen compelling evidence and which has not been trusted?

 

Much as I enjoy seeing Corbyn make a mug of himself, like attending a Jewdas dinner, genuinely Mark, don't go down on a sinking ship.... 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
11 minutes ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Jeremy Corbyn advocates "caution."

 

A broad raft of other independent national governments and organisations implement direct action....

 

Which do you think might have seen compelling evidence and which has not been trusted?

 

Much as I enjoy seeing Corbyn make a mug of himself, like attending a Jewdas dinner, genuinely Mark, don't go down on a sinking ship.... 

image.thumb.png.5711123765dbf734d133afc71b792cf6.png

Posted
Just now, Mark J said:

image.thumb.png.5711123765dbf734d133afc71b792cf6.png

Novochok is Russian made by Russians plus if you read porton downs report they freely admit they was only given a sample to test what nerve agent it was (nothing else) and it was the governments job to use all the evidence it had to decide where it came from, who did it etc. 

 

 

Posted

A lot of the powers that be want to keep Russia as the evil enemy. I didn't and still don't buy any of it. Way too fast a conclusion to have come to by our government. 

 

If Putin wanted someone dead in the UK why the hell use a sophisticated chemical agent that could potentially be tied to Russian manufacture? Surely cyanide solution fired from a damn water pistol onto the clothing anywhere on the body that contacts the skin would suffice.. or any number of other untraceable efforts. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, forestboy1978 said:

A lot of the powers that be want to keep Russia as the evil enemy. I didn't and still don't buy any of it. Way too fast a conclusion to have come to by our government. 

 

If Putin wanted someone dead in the UK why the hell use a sophisticated chemical agent that could potentially be tied to Russian manufacture? Surely cyanide solution fired from a damn water pistol onto the clothing anywhere on the body that contacts the skin would suffice.. or any number of other untraceable efforts. 

Putin is the one who wants the west attacking Russia, it allows he to play the hard man and foster popularity at home. He had no interest in killing these people other than to play his political game. Obviously the means of murder had to point directly to Russia.

Posted

So he's asking for a bilateral government enquiry to prove his guilt?

 

If playing the hard man does indeed foster popularity at home.. whatever that even means, does asking for a further and more thorough investigation into the matter present him more guilty to those who he wants to impress?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I guess it's possible and perhaps ideal to be known to be guilty by those you want to know, whilst all the while proclaim your innocence. 

 

Still, it stinks. Our government want the world to know this business and their "position" on it. If they didn't want us to know, we wouldn't and frankly shouldn't.  

Edited by forestboy1978
  • Like 2
Posted

May was HS when Alexander Litvinenko was poisoned, May did nothing, his widow was had to fight to get it investigated. May was humiliated by the findings of the investigation. There is no way she was going to let this one slip away quietly.

  • Like 1
Posted

Have other governments just played follow the leader or have they seen sufficient evidence to come to the same conclusion?

 

Q to consider, would other nations want to make an enemy of Russia on a whim?!

Posted
2 minutes ago, WesD said:

Have other governments just played follow the leader or have they seen sufficient evidence to come to the same conclusion?

 

Q to consider, would other nations want to make an enemy of Russia on a whim?!

No. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.