Making the news today....

[GarethM]

Aren't a lot of the wind turbines also owned by vattenfall ?. Which is effectively the Swedish government, which you can't buy shares in.

 

So guess they Vattenfall were the precursor to state nationalised EDF.

[devon TWiG]

4 hours ago, GarethM said:

Aren't a lot of the wind turbines also owned by vattenfall ?. Which is effectively the Swedish government, which you can't buy shares in.

 

So guess they Vattenfall were the precursor to state nationalised EDF.

perhaps this was partly / wholly to do with EU rules at the time , whereby contracts over a certain value were available by  tender  to any company in the EU ....

 

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, devon TWiG said:

perhaps this was partly / wholly to do with EU rules at the time , whereby contracts over a certain value were available by  tender  to any company in the EU ....

 

Absolutely disgusting and totally exposes the lies that politicians both sides of the border and the green fools spout. It would create tens of thousands of jobs if someone at least had the balls and long term vision to put things in motion to ensure a minimum local content.

[Mesterh]

2 hours ago, devon TWiG said:

perhaps this was partly / wholly to do with EU rules at the time , whereby contracts over a certain value were available by  tender  to any company in the EU ....

 

I remember putting in a tender for some la work a long time ago. I asked at the interview if local firms had any advantage. The answer was a firm no. If a tree company in Germany could do the same work for less money and still show that they could meet all the requirements then it would go to them! Suffice to say a firm 300 miles away won the contract then farmed it out to local firms at a shitty rate. Some local lads took them up on the offer as they needed the work.

 

 

 

 

 

[JaySmith]

8 hours ago, Mesterh said:

I remember putting in a tender for some la work a long time ago. I asked at the interview if local firms had any advantage. The answer was a firm no. If a tree company in Germany could do the same work for less money and still show that they could meet all the requirements then it would go to them! Suffice to say a firm 300 miles away won the contract then farmed it out to local firms at a shitty rate. Some local lads took them up on the offer as they needed the work.

 

 

 

Unfortunately this is still very much still happening. Due to procurement rules it is often the cheapest price that wins, regardless of where they are from and whether or not they are ultimately the best contractor to undertake the works. Due to the nature of the contracts they are then allowed to sub the work out if they bite off more than they can chew which then looses the client even more control over the contract. But they get the work done for the cheapest price so it must be the best use of the money, surely?! No. 

 

 

[JaySmith]

Just now, JaySmith said:

 

Unfortunately this is still very much still happening. Due to procurement rules it is often the cheapest price that wins, regardless of where they are from and whether or not they are ultimately the best contractor to undertake the works. Due to the nature of the contracts they are then allowed to sub the work out if they bite off more than they can chew which then looses the client even more control over the contract. But they get the work done for the cheapest price so it must be the best use of the money, surely?! No. 

[Johnsond]

51 minutes ago, JaySmith said:

Unfortunately this is still very much still happening. Due to procurement rules it is often the cheapest price that wins, regardless of where they are from and whether or not they are ultimately the best contractor to undertake the works. Due to the nature of the contracts they are then allowed to sub the work out if they bite off more than they can chew which then looses the client even more control over the contract. But they get the work done for the cheapest price so it must be the best use of the money, surely?! No. 

Definitely not no 

In the case of the article about the sea green base units the fact is we are supporting thousands of jobs in China whilst at the same time ignoring the opportunity to rebuild an industry here on our own shores. Insanity as far as I’m concerned. 

[Johnsond]

Rishi Sunak: Former chancellor who lost out last time

APPLE.NEWS

---

A former finance analyst, Rishi Sunak was runner-up in the previous leadership contest.

Well here comes the supposed saviour  etc etc. People have a very very  short memory as it was undoubtedly his irresponsible fiscal policies and support of lockdown madness that has massively contributed to the current mess we are in. Maybe he is the candidate the markets etc wanted after all, to keep the cash flowing in the right direction. I think this is when the covid gullible are gonna realise that it really is payback tine. 

Edited October 24, 2022 by Johnsond

[coppice cutter]

So do you think Truss had a hit job done on her by her own party because it was the membership that put her there over the heads of the parliamentarians?

 

And now they're back on plan?

[Johnsond]

59 minutes ago, coppice cutter said:

So do you think Truss had a hit job done on her by her own party because it was the membership that put her there over the heads of the parliamentarians?

 

And now they're back on plan?

Well he was part of the team who got us to where we are now !! If he had the answers to all the problems all along why didn’t he use that knowledge then rather than tell us he’s gonna do it now. For me he is from a massively wealthy multi millionaire background that has benefitted from an immoral tax break who has zero knowledge of the reality of things for most people. I look at where we were pre covid and where we are now and try and look at whom-and what individuals or organisations/corporations have benefited from the past two years MSM promoted madness !!. Yeah the conspiracy comments will be made but throw in an avoidable but massively profitable war as per normal with the Democrats and just look around at what’s going on and what we are paying out just to get by !!!. The answer to your original question is I’m not sure it was a blatant hit but at the same time I do not think certain people got the leader they wanted and also think the current selection criteria was devised to be able to select a suitable candidate without the need to put it to the party members. I hope I’m wrong. For me Sunak is far from the answer.