Making the news today....

[Mesterh]

20 hours ago, Mark J said:

To be honest, I'd rather not talk about it at all, as it's vile. But some things need to be said. 

I get you. 

[Mark J]

2 hours ago, Johnsond said:

One things it’s not and that’s the “ Far Right” we have heard a lot lately about the rise of the far right yet here we are in familiar territory. 
The antisemitism that Labour allow to fester and Starmers tolerance and pandering to certain groups will not be explained away by some weak mealy mouthed waffle that no doubt will follow tonight. 
Just watched Starmers pathetic speech, a single mention of a vile individual 🤷‍♂️

At least the taxpayer won't be paying for his jail. 

[Welshfred]

I saw this headline and thought immediately of this thread. I read the article and this thread made a load more sense!

 

Do you know about shitposting? It’s cheap humour, rage bait – and now, it seems, US government policy | Robert Topinka | The Guardian

WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM

---

Donald Trump’s White House reveals a new ‘portrait’ of Joe Biden – and in his world, if you don’t laugh, the joke’s on you, says Robert Topinka of Birkbeck, University of London

 

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Mark J said:

At least the taxpayer won't be paying for his jail. 

The suspect in the attack on the Manchester synagogue has been named as Jihad Al-Shamie.
The 35-year-old is a British citizen of Syrian descent.
 

So bloody predictable Mark, more arrests made too. Not the first nor will it be the last. 

[Mark J]

7 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

The suspect in the attack on the Manchester synagogue has been named as Jihad Al-Shamie.
The 35-year-old is a British citizen of Syrian descent.
 

So bloody predictable Mark, more arrests made too. Not the first nor will it be the last. 

I'm really not bothered who the nutcase is, or where he came from. I'm almost glad we won't be paying 50K a year to keep him in jail. Which makes me question my humanity.
 

[Johnsond]

30 minutes ago, Mark J said:

I'm really not bothered who the nutcase is, or where he came from. I'm almost glad we won't be paying 50K a year to keep him in jail. Which makes me question my humanity.
 

 

30 minutes ago, Mark J said:

I'm really not bothered who the nutcase is

As Starmer said a vile individual.

Both of you seem to be avoiding the elephant in the room. 
And no there’s wrong with him seeing swift justice. 
 

Edited 2 hours ago by Johnsond

[daveatdave]

1 hour ago, Johnsond said:

 

As Starmer said a vile individual.

Both of you seem to be avoiding the elephant in the room. 
And no there’s wrong with him seeing swift justice. 
 

and now there will be an inquest with the police and the copper who shot him will cost a few thousands and no doubt the copper will be suspended on full pay (which is ok) while the inquest is over    

[Mark J]

Both of us? 

[Mark J]

11 minutes ago, daveatdave said:

and now there will be an inquest with the police and the copper who shot him will cost a few thousands and no doubt the copper will be suspended on full pay (which is ok) while the inquest is over    

That's probably standard. It seems to pretty clear that the person shot was the one who was dangerous. 
It's probably not a bad thing for the copper to have some time off after having to deal with that situation.

[AHPP]

Speak in the active voice. Who shot who? Who was dangerous to who?