Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

So do you reckon 6.8p for breakfast for kids is a policy we should be championing? Bearing in mind, it's the only one the tories have costed?

 

"The PM doesn't do TV debates because they only really appeal to X Factor / Jeremy Kyle retards - there's nothing more to it! ".

 

What about the electorate who would like to hear her policies? There's a huge swathe of the population who would watch the debate. Are they retards?

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Children should be fed (breakfast) at home not at school!

 

The responsibility for providing the platform for children to flourish at school lies firmly with the parent / guardian NOT the school.

 

School is for education. That's it.

 

There's a VERY limited space where the "state" might set strategic policy for raising children but the tactical / operational / day-to-day business of parenting is for PARENTS not state or, by extension, school.

Posted

What about the electorate who would like to hear her policies? There's a huge swathe of the population who would watch the debate. Are they retards?

Posted
It does have some potential merit. It's not something that really concerns me a huge amount. NHS, schools, elderly concern me.

 

Mark, we all want good schools and a good NHS. However Jeremy Corbyn also wants more immigration.

 

Even if Saint Jeremy finds extra money for schools etc it's likely that the amount of migrants wanting these public services will mean standards in schools/ the NHS goes down.

 

If Jeremy really cared about the British working class he'd be doing everything he possibly could to reduce low skilled immigration.

Posted
What about the electorate who would like to hear her policies? There's a huge swathe of the population who would watch the debate. Are they retards?

 

 

Sorry, missed that bit....

 

If they vote for Chairman Mao, Yes!

Posted
Worth a watch if you're interested in The Conservative plans for NHS assets.

 

 

The Naylor Report: The Tory asset-stripping of ALL NHS assets.

The Tories plan for the NHS: The "Naylor Report" outlines the accelerated selling off of ALL NHS land, buildings and assets on a two for one basis. The Tories claim they want to protect the NHS. They don’t – they fully intend to flog it off and to add insult to injury they plan to use £10 billion of our money to cover the cost of the fire-sale.

No comments on this from the Mayniacs? It's frightening stuff, if you're in the vast majority of the British public who believe in the NHS; if you've a vested interest in a private healthcare company and prefer the appallingly inefficient US system - maybe not so much.

For those who either can't be bothered - or are too afraid of upsetting their confirmation bias - to watch it, the whole plan in a nutshell is to use our tax money to give sweetheart deals to private investors to buy British Land and British Hospitals all paid for by you into the private sectors, then the Trusts will have to rent that same land and those same building back from the Private sector to be able to carry on doing the job they do so well already. The 10 billion that Theresa May keeps saying they are going to put into the NHS is purely going in to sweeten the pot and ensure the NHS doesn't even get the full value of the land and buildings they are being forced to sell.

I don't know anyone else feels about this but I, and many of my family who work in healthcare, am absolutely furious at the thought that this perfidious government can even consider doing this to OUR NHS :sneaky2:

Oh, and as for the refusal of the Maybot to demonstrate her ''strong and stable' leadership by refusing to debate Corbyn, I'm with Paddy Ashdown -

“We are the only advanced democracy in the world in which the leader of our nation can get away with not turning up to have a proper debate with the opposition. I think it is extraordinary and we don’t seem to be kicking up a fuss about it.”

Posted
No comments on this from the Mayniacs? It's frightening stuff, if you're in the vast majority of the British public who believe in the NHS; if you've a vested interest in a private healthcare company and prefer the appallingly inefficient US system - maybe not so much.

 

One minute we're hearing that the NHS is falling to bits and nurses need food banks to survive. We also hear the NHS has too many managers. Then the next minute we're hearing that the NHS is a national treasure that needs protecting at all cost?

 

Maybe it's time for a national debate regarding the NHS?

 

We trust a lot of private companies to provide essential services. For instance food/ housing/ air travel etc are all provided by private companies. I don't see why healthcare has to be provided by a state behemoth...

Posted
One minute we're hearing that the NHS is falling to bits and nurses need food banks to survive. We also hear the NHS has too many managers. Then the next minute we're hearing that the NHS is a national treasure that needs protecting at all cost?

 

Maybe it's time for a national debate regarding the NHS?

 

We trust a lot of private companies to provide essential services. For instance food/ housing/ air travel etc are all provided by private companies. I don't see why healthcare has to be provided by a state behemoth...

The clue is in the name. National Health Service.

 

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Arbtalk mobile app

Posted
No comments on this from the Mayniacs? It's frightening stuff, if you're in the vast majority of the British public who believe in the NHS; if you've a vested interest in a private healthcare company and prefer the appallingly inefficient US system - maybe not so much.

For those who either can't be bothered - or are too afraid of upsetting their confirmation bias - to watch it, the whole plan in a nutshell is to use our tax money to give sweetheart deals to private investors to buy British Land and British Hospitals all paid for by you into the private sectors, then the Trusts will have to rent that same land and those same building back from the Private sector to be able to carry on doing the job they do so well already. The 10 billion that Theresa May keeps saying they are going to put into the NHS is purely going in to sweeten the pot and ensure the NHS doesn't even get the full value of the land and buildings they are being forced to sell.

I don't know anyone else feels about this but I, and many of my family who work in healthcare, am absolutely furious at the thought that this perfidious government can even consider doing this to OUR NHS :sneaky2:

Oh, and as for the refusal of the Maybot to demonstrate her ''strong and stable' leadership by refusing to debate Corbyn, I'm with Paddy Ashdown -

“We are the only advanced democracy in the world in which the leader of our nation can get away with not turning up to have a proper debate with the opposition. I think it is extraordinary and we don’t seem to be kicking up a fuss about it.”

Well said.

 

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Arbtalk mobile app

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.