wood burners

[daveatdave]

MSN

WWW.MSN.COM

 

[Squaredy]

10 hours ago, daveatdave said:

MSN

WWW.MSN.COM

 

The details of this will be interesting.  Whatever is proposed however will it be policed....?!

[Oldfeller]

I wonder how well labour burns?

[GarethM]

16 minutes ago, Oldfeller said:

I wonder how well labour burns?

Bit like those flyer magazines, great at first full of fire and promise then just smoulders and quickly goes out.

[Muddy42]

The problem with a government that doesn't have any money is they have to justify their existence by making rules and regulations.

 

Dirty smoke is caused by poor fuel (insufficient seasoning time for wood) and has nothing to do with the device burning it or its 'efficiency'.  If you put wet fuel on an open fire or a ecodesign stove both will produce dirty smoke.

 

[Steven P]

the last government wanted to do the same thing too, went quiet for a bit, is this just them dusting off those ideas again?

[Stubby]

14 minutes ago, Steven P said:

the last government wanted to do the same thing too, went quiet for a bit, is this just them dusting off those ideas again?

As above . Too many variables and how do you police it ? Its all bollox anyway . One airbus A330 taking off does more harm . 

[Steven P]

Yup, I'd agree with that.

[Tree monkey 1682]

7 hours ago, Squaredy said:

The details of this will be interesting.  Whatever is proposed however will it be policed....?!

Its a load of shite, its people burning 'dirty' wood on a fire, albeit if its tanalised,  painted or other shite . That's where the problem lies 

[Mick Dempsey]

I don’t think you can still buy wood burners that don’t afterburn or something, secondary burn maybe is the phrase.

 

Do they have a law in the uk about moisture content from fire wood suppliers?