Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Questions need to be asked as to why the council did not have a TPO on it, considering the rarity of ancients, and the fact they are well mapped on the ancient trees website. Some tree officers need sacking!

 

However I dont think councils are the right people to manage valuable trees. They often do what they like anyway, particually if any money is involved.

I believe ancient trees such as this should have some protection. Perhaps limiting removal but allowing crown lowering where nessasary.

 

Naturally as they age, the roots are unable to support a large crown, the tops die back and a lower crown will grow. The old tops can be good habbitat but also become unsafe and often get pruned.

 

Heres some before pics

Screenshot_2025-04-15-20-48-10-432_com.google.android_apps_maps.thumb.png.1146599f3c0af6e22027e56ab3ab9e1a.png

Screenshot_2025-04-15-20-48-39-906_com.google.android_apps_maps.thumb.png.fe5f397435604d083e93a41419bd1600.png

 

  • Like 5
Posted
1 hour ago, pleasant said:

Who did the work?

Ive only heard this through the grape vine but it seems like it was Bolam.

The police report stated that they found 6 cans of wife beater at the scene, its a given.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 14
Posted (edited)

As always press getting it wrong. Trunk left standing so pollarded not felled. 

And from what I ve read no TPO. 

Edited by woody paul
  • Like 1
Posted

Lord! If I ran a pub with that close by (it was on Enfield land), I would do my due diligence plus a load more checks! Just what did they think they were ordering!?! If I were on the tools, I'd really question the work order too!

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, PeteB said:

Lord! If I ran a pub with that close by (it was on Enfield land), I would do my due diligence plus a load more checks! Just what did they think they were ordering!?! If I were on the tools, I'd really question the work order too!

How did they not? Removed on h&s grounds - sought the advice of a professional survey and undertook the recommended works. Lovely tree so it’s a shame but heavy footfall and traffic area.  Significant….. so much so nobody bothered to put in an application. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Looks rotten as fook.

It's a tree gents,when people get teary at my Felling old sticks, I ask them if they would accept personal liability for any damages if we retained it?

 

Ps,It was Bolam & his groundy Ezrah , a famous deep water Jew.

  • Haha 1
Posted
11 hours ago, woody paul said:

As always press getting it wrong. Trunk left standing so pollarded not felled. 

And from what I ve read no TPO. 

Pollarded? 
 

So you expect that’ll grow back ?! 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.