Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Conifer hedge standing volume to chip volume


Ty Korrigan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I wasn't bored, just my usual boring self, so I began taking a note of standing conifer hedge volumes before chipping.

This is really due to a recent regulation in France that requires the m3 of waste to be mentioned on quotes as part of a drive to screw down fly tipping.

So I found myself measuring conifer hedges.

I have found the volume is reduced between 8-10 fold with chipping.

Does this match others experience or am I well out?

   Yawn....

 

 

 

IMG-20221202-WA0007.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

14 minutes ago, Ty Korrigan said:

I wasn't bored, just my usual boring self, so I began taking a note of standing conifer hedge volumes before chipping.

This is really due to a recent regulation in France that requires the m3 of waste to be mentioned on quotes as part of a drive to screw down fly tipping.

So I found myself measuring conifer hedges.

I have found the volume is reduced between 8-10 fold with chipping.

Does this match others experience or am I well out?

   Yawn....

 

 

 

IMG-20221202-WA0007.jpg

I love your empirical approaches to work. Very useful. Also reminds me of the bit in DS9 where the Cardassians' record keeping is compared to the Nazis'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We took out a conifer hedge this week, one we have managed for ten years with trimming, so it was straight sided and flat topped, ie a bit easier to visualise volume reduction. Measuring accurately (26L x 2.5W x 3H) the volume of the hedge was 195 cu metres, but we need to allow for it having the trunks visible at the bottom. It was a dense hedge with no gaps. Let's say the volume of "air space" the hedge took up was 180 cu metres, or even take it down to a speculative 150 cu metres.

Our chip box capacity is 7.5 - 8 cu metres, when absolutely full. We got everything in with one and a half/two thirds loads, including room for rakes, all the sweeping and any timber that was not chipped.

So on this job we can safely say the volume reduction was at least 10 fold, and in fact probably a bit more.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.