Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Large, dead ash clearance job. Advice appreciated


Big J
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Big J said:

Lots of interesting responses - many thanks!

 

The average tree size is very small. 12cm at chest height probably and only 8m tall. There are some that are taller, but most aren't. The weight of a tree like that is about 50kg, if that, so I don't think that the 3t machine would struggle. There are some trees that are a little larger (like the those in the third photo), but most aren't. 

 

The issue with a larger machine is that it's largely mixed planting and they don't want to damage the remaining trees. Even a 5t machine (track width 1.8m) would be too large.

 

Most of your collective concerns regarding safety whilst felling should be mitigated by the small size of the trees. The grapple saw straight onto a forwarding trailer idea reduces handling to the extent where it's potentially possible to make it commercially viable. 

 

As regards chip points, I'd look to find a chipper/trailer combo set up where the tree lengths could be left at ride side for the tractor to chip in situp, taking the full trailers of chip back to the shed for uplift. There are rides everywhere in the woodland and the extraction routes for the excavator would never exceed 100m.

 

We can't mulch it, as it's a mixed woodland. I think (from speaking to the old lad that looks after it) that it was planted by the Commission as a test site. The overall result of the test is that hardwoods don't grow well here at all. 

 

Thanks for the pointers on chip price John. I'd like to think that 25 cube of chip per acre would be a reasonable estimate. That's only the equivilent of about 8-9 fresh tonnes, and considering it's effectively a 50% clearfell I can't be far off.

 

I'll speak to a local chip company today and see what sort of price they'd offer for chip loaded to a walking floor.

 

This is the sort of machine I'd consider tackling the operation with:

 

Image may contain: sky and outdoor

If the track width the same as mine I think it’ll be about 1.8m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

12 minutes ago, Stere said:

Would firewood create be better value?

 

Small diameter but alot of tall looking straight  trunks would could be processed with right set up with some kind of branch logger?

 

 

Way too much fiddle?

Yes, unfortunately. They did have a pile of about 35 cube of thinnings in one of their sheds and I don't know any firewood retailer who would touch it. It's ideal for a domestic user as none of it needs to be split, but too slow to be commercially viable on a larger scale. 

 

Even £15/cube for chip translates to £60/t which is more than I'd get for it as log. Additionally, there is no way a timber lorry would come close to getting a weight on with it being dry. 

 

Interestingly (just been on the phone), Euroforest would take it from rideside and chip it free of charge, so the only cost for the land owner would be the excavator. £35-40k with the excavator, works out at about £300/acre which I don't think it too bad at all for complete removal of an average of probably 400 trees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moving log / wood is assessed as low risk of spreading the infection.  Moving large volume of chip might not be quite so good....

 

https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/pest-and-disease-resources/chalara-ash-dieback-hymenoscyphus-fraxineus/chalara-manual-2-managing-ash-trees-and-woodland-including-logs-and-firewood/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stere said:

Would firewood create be better value?

 

Small diameter but alot of tall looking straight  trunks could be processed with right set up with some kind of branch logger?

 

WWW.WOODPROCESSOR24.CO.UK

RP200 SUPER PRO with hydraulic conveyor INNER WIDTH 300mm INTERLINE SPACING 200mm BLADE THICKNESS...

 

 

Way too much fiddle?

Yep, too much fiddle for the volume. Not sure how you'd move 4000 cube of low grade logs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kevinjohnsonmbe said:

Moving log / wood is assessed as low risk of spreading the infection.  Moving large volume of chip might not be quite so good....

 

https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/pest-and-disease-resources/chalara-ash-dieback-hymenoscyphus-fraxineus/chalara-manual-2-managing-ash-trees-and-woodland-including-logs-and-firewood/

Are we not way past that now? I thought it was everywhere 

 

Edited by Woodworks
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Woodworks said:

Are we not way past that now? I thought it was everywhere 

 

That was my thought too. It is now ubiquitous in the UK, and trying to prevent it's spread seems a bit like rushing to close the farm gate after the horse has bolted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I thought that after posting and whilst on a (rate) drive to Plymuff. 

 

It’s certainly hereabouts now. Later than elsewhere perhaps, but very noticeable. 

 

All very well for QUANGOs to issue guidance to industry about minimising spread, but where were the pseudo authorities when prevention might have been better than minimising spread?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Woodworks said:

Are we not way past that now? I thought it was everywhere 

 

It is everywhere near me but that means many woodland trees are receiving large doses of spores which are infecting multiple sites on the trees. I'm not up with the science of how a plant reacts to infection  but imagine that it stands less chance  under an overwhelming  infection, whereas it may overcome a single point of infection and be able to compartmentalise it if it has a degree of immunity. If so then as the bulk of the ash population is removed then there is less leaf litter and thence less spores produced so a stock of trees still alive with some immunity  may survive to have progeny.

 

I think I am seeing possible signs of this in local woodlands where nearly every tree is affected whereas  there are apparently unaffected trees in gardens  only a few miles away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.